a favourable opportunity happens, and that the son
never loses sight of an injury that has been done
to his father.[145] Their method of executing their
horrible designs, is by stealing upon the adverse
party in the night; and if they find them unguarded,
(which, however, I believe, is very seldom the case,)
they kill every one indiscriminately; not even sparing
the women and children. When the massacre is
completed, they either feast and gorge themselves
on the spot, or carry off as many of the dead bodies
as they can, and devour them at home, with acts of
brutality too shocking to be described. If they
are discovered before they can execute their bloody
purpose, they generally steal off again, and sometimes
are pursued and attacked by the other party in their
turn. To give quarter, or to take prisoners,
makes no part of their military law; so that the vanquished
can only save their lives by flight. This perpetual
state of war, and destructive method of conducting
it, operates so strongly in producing habitual circumspection,
that one hardly ever finds a New Zealander off his
guard either by night or by day. Indeed, no other
man can have such powerful motives to be vigilant,
as the preservation both of body and of soul depends
upon it; for, according to their system of belief,
the soul of the man whose flesh is devoured by the
enemy, is doomed to a perpetual fire, while the soul
of the man whose body has been rescued from those
who killed him, as well as the souls of all who die
a natural death, ascend to the habitations of the gods.
I asked, Whether they eat the flesh of such of their
friends as had been killed in war, but whose bodies
were saved from falling into the enemy’s hands?
They seemed surprised at the question, which they answered
in the negative, expressing some abhorrence at the
very idea. Their common method of disposing of
their dead, is by depositing their bodies in the earth;
but if they have more of their slaughtered enemies
than they can eat, they throw them into the sea.
[Footnote 145: Every reader almost will here
recollect, that a similar disposition to perpetuate
grievances has been found to operate in all barbarous
nations, and indeed amongst many people who lay great
claims to refinement in civilization. It will
be found, in truth, too strong an effort for most
men’s charity, to regard with perfect impartiality
either a person or a nation whom their fathers had
pointed out as an enemy. On the great scale of
the world, we see it is the nearly inevitable consequence
of war to generate malicious feelings. In addition,
then, to some contrariety of interest, to some real
or imaginary aggression, or even a bare possibility
of being injured, it is almost enough, at any time,
for the commencement of a new struggle betwixt rival
nations, that one, or both of them, remember they were
formerly at variance. Nor is it at all requisite
for due rancour in such cases, that politicians explain
the grounds of the quarrel, and aggravate the enormous