the West so brilliant and fickle,—of duality
such poles apart,—so lobsided and, I think,
in a true sense, so little progressive. For see
how many centuries we have had to wait while ignorance,
bigotry, wrong ideas, and persecution, have prevented
the establishment on any large scale of a Theosophical
Movement—and be not too ready to accept
a whirl of political changes, experiment after experiment,—and
latterly a spurt of mechanical inventions,—for
True Progress: which I take to mean, rightly
considered, the growth of human egos, and freedom
and an atmosphere in which they may grow. But
these they had in China abundantly while China was
in manvantara; do not think I am urging as our example
the fallen China of these pralayic times. Balance
was the truth Confucius impressed on the Chinese mentality:
the saving Truth of truths, I may say; and it is
perhaps the truth which most of all will stand connected
with the name of Katherine Tingley in the ages to
come:—the saving Truth of truths, which
will make a new and better world for us. You
must have it, if you are to build solidly; it is the
foundation of any true social order; the bedrock on
which alone a veritable civilization can be built.
Oh, your unbalanced genius can produce things of startling
beauty; and they have their value, heaven knows.
The Soul watches for its chances, and leaps in at
surprising moments: the arm clothed in white
samite may reach forth out of the bosom of all sorts
of curious quagmires; and when it does, should be held
in reverence as still and always a proof of the underlying
divinity of man. But—there where the
basis of things is not firmly set: where that
mystic, wonderful reaching out is not from the clear
lake, but from turbidity and festering waters—
where the grand balance has not been acquired:—You
must look to come on tragedy. The world has
gained something from the speech of the Soul there;
but the man through whom It spoke;—it has
proved too much for him. The vibrations were
too strong, and shattered him. Think of Keats
. . . and of thousands of others, poets, musicians,
artists. Where you get the grand creations,
the unfitful shining,—there you get evidence
of a balance: with genius—the daimonic
force—no greater than, perhaps not so keen
as, that of those others, you find a strong moral will.
Dante and Milton suffered no less than others from
those perils to which all creative artists are subject:
both complain bitterly of inner assailments and torment;
but they had, to balance their genius, the strong
moral urge to fight their weaknesses all through life.
It could not save their personalities from suffering;
but it gave the Soul in each of them a basis on which
to build the grand steadfast creations.—All
of which Chinese Liehtse tells you without comment,
and with an air of being too childish-foolish for
this world, in the following story:—