ever wear in remembrance of my fault, and when pride shall exalt me, a look to this love-lace shall lessen it (ll. 2407-2438).  But since ye are the lord of yonder land, from whom I have received so much honour, tell me truly your right name, and I shall ask no more questions.”

Quoth the other, “I am called Bernlak de Hautdesert, through might of Morgain la Fay, who dwells in my house.  Much has she learnt of Merlin, who knows all your knights at home.  She brought me to your hall for to essay the prowess of the Round Table.  She wrought this wonder to bereave you of your wits, hoping to have grieved Guenever and affrighted her to death by means of the man that spoke with his head in his hand before the high table.  She is even thine aunt, Arthur’s half sister; wherefore come to thine aunt, for all my household love thee.”

    Gawayne refuses to accompany the Green Knight, and so, with many
    embraces and kind wishes, they separate—­the one to his castle, the
    other to Arthur’s court.

After passing through many wild ways, our knight recovers from the wound in his neck, and at last comes safe and sound to the court of King Arthur.  Great then was the joy of all; the king and queen kiss their brave knight, and make many enquiries about his journey.  He tells them of his adventures, hiding nothing—­“the chance of the chapel, the cheer of the knight, the love of the lady, and lastly of the lace.”  Groaning for grief and shame he shows them the cut in his neck, which he had received for his unfaithfulness (ll. 2439-2504).  The king and his courtiers comfort the knight—­they laugh loudly at his adventures, and unanimously agree that those lords and ladies that belonged to the Round Table, and each knight of the brotherhood should ever after wear a bright green belt for Gawayne’s sake.  And he upon whom it was conferred honoured it evermore after.

    Thus in Arthur’s time this adventure befell, whereof the “Brutus Books”
    bear witness (ll. 2505-2530).

I need not say that the Brutus Books we possess do not contain the legend here set forth, though it is not much more improbable than some of the statements contained in them.  If the reader desires to know the relation in which this and the like stories stand to the original Arthur legends, he will find it discussed in Sir F. Madden’s Preface to his edition of “Syr Gawayne,” which also contains a sketch of the very different views taken of Sir Gawayne by the different Romance writers.

Into this and other literary questions I do not enter here, as I have nothing to add to Sir F. Madden’s statements; but in the text of the Poem I have differed from him in some few readings, which will be found noticed in the Notes and Glossary.

As the manuscript is fast fading, I am glad that the existence of the Early English Text Society has enabled us to secure a wider diffusion of its contents before the original shall be no longer legible.