which were rigidly enforced, forbid tenants to build
houses for their labourers, ’the consequence
of which was that men and women servants, no matter
how great the number, must live under one roof.’
The rules forbid marriage without the agent’s
permission. A young couple got married, and were
chased away to America; and ’the two fathers-in-law
were not merely warned; they were punished for harbouring
their son and daughter, by a fine of a gale of rent.’
It was a rule ’that no stranger be lodged or
harboured in any house upon the estate, lest he should
become sick or idle, or in some way chargeable upon
the poor-rates.’ ’Several were warned
and punished for giving lodging to a brother-in-law,
a daughter,’ &c. ’A poor widow got
her daughter married without the necessary permission;
she was served with a notice to quit, which was withdrawn
on the payment of three gales of rent.’
Mr. Crosbie gives a number of cases of the kind.
The following are the most remarkable. A tenant,
Timothy Sullivan, of Derrynabrack, occasionally gave
lodging to his sister-in-law, whilst her husband was
seeking for work. He was afraid to lodge both
or either; ’but the poor woman was in low fever,
and approaching her confinement. Even under such
circumstances his terror was so great that he removed
her to a temporary shed on Jeremiah Sullivan’s
land, where she gave birth to a child. She remained
there for some time. When “the office”
heard of it, Jeremiah Sullivan was sent for and compelled
to pay a gale of rent (as fine), and to throw down
the shed. Thus driven out, and with every tenant
on the estate afraid to afford her a refuge, the miserable
woman went about two miles up the mountain, and, sick
as she was, and so situated, took shelter in a dry
cavern, in which she lived for several days.
But her presence even there was a crime, and a mulct
of another gale of rent was levied off Jeremiah Sullivan.
Thus, within three weeks he was compelled to pay two
gales of 3 l. 2 s. 6 d. each. It was declared
also that the mountain being the joint property of
Jeremiah Sullivan, Timothy Sullivan, and Thady Sullivan,
Timothy Sullivan was a participator in the crime,
and should be fined a gale of rent. The third,
it appears, escaped.’ ‘S.G.O.’
narrated another horrifying case in the Times,
at the period of its occurrence, in 1851. Abridged,
it runs thus:—’An order had gone
forth on the estate (a common order in Ireland) that
no tenant was to admit any lodger into his house.
This was a general order. It appears, however,
that sometimes special orders were given; and one
was promulgated that Denis Shea should not be harboured.
This boy had no father living. He had lived with
a grandmother, who had been turned out of her holding
for harbouring him. He had stolen a shilling,
a hen—done such things as a neglected twelve-year-old
famishing child will do. One night he came to
his aunt Donoghue, who lodged with Casey. The
latter told the aunt and uncle not to allow him into