is secure without work, and who cannot obtain more
than a mere sufficiency by the hardest work, will
naturally be an idle and careless labourer. Frequently
the work done by four or five such labourers does
not amount to what might easily be performed by a
single labourer at task work. A surplus population
is encouraged: men who receive but a small pittance
know that they have only to marry and that pittance
will be increased proportionally to the number of their
children. When complaining of their allowance,
they frequently say, “We will marry, and then
you must maintain us.” This system secures
subsistence to all; to the idle as well as the industrious;
to the profligate as well as the sober; and, as far
as human interests are concerned, all inducements
to obtain a good character are taken away. The
effects have corresponded with the cause: able-bodied
men are found slovenly at their work, and dissolute
in their hours of relaxation; a father is negligent
of his children, the children do not think it necessary
to contribute to the support of their parents; the
employer and employed are engaged in personal quarrels;
and the pauper, always relieved, is always discontented.
Crime advances with increasing boldness; and the parts
of the country where this system prevails are, in
spite of our gaols and our laws, filled with poachers
and thieves.’ Mr. Hodges, chairman of the
West Kent quarter sessions, in his evidence before
the emigration committee, said, ’Formerly, working
people usually stayed in service till they were twenty-five,
thirty, and thirty-five years of age, before they married;
whereas they now married frequently under age.
Formerly, these persons had saved 40 l. and 50 l.
before they married, and they were never burdensome
to the parish; now, they have not saved a shilling
before their marriage, and become immediately burdensome.’
The farmers were not so discontented with this allowance
system as might be supposed, because a great part
of the burden was cast upon other shoulders.
The tax was laid indiscrimately upon all fixed property;
so that the occupiers of villas, shopkeepers, merchants,
and others who did not employ labourers, had to pay
a portion of the wages for those that did. The
farmers were in this way led to encourage a system
which fraudently imposed a heavy burden upon others,
and which, by degrading the labourers, and multiplying
their numbers beyond the real demand for them, must,
if allowed to run its full course, have ultimately
overspread the whole country with the most abject poverty
and wretchedness.
There was another interest created which tended to
increase the evil. In the counties of Suffolk,
Sussex, Kent, and generally through all the south
of England, relief was given in the shape of house
accommodation, or free dwellings for the poor.
The parish officers were in the habit of paying the
rent of the cottages; the rent was therefore high
and sure, and consequently persons who had small pieces