This feeling was strengthened by the result of the attempts made in the autumn session of 1882, to improve the procedure of the House of Commons.  We had cherished the hope that more drastic remedies against obstruction and better arrangements for the conduct of business, might relieve much of the pressure Irish members had made us suffer.  The passing of the New Rules shattered this hope, for it was plain they would not accomplish what was needed.  Some blamed the Government for not framing a more stringent code.  Some blamed the Tory and the Irish Oppositions (now beginning to work in concert) for cutting down the proposals of the Government.  But most of us saw, and came to see still more clearly in the three succeeding sessions, that the evil was too deep-rooted to be cured by any changes of procedure, unless they went so far as to destroy freedom of debate for English members also.  The presence in a deliberative assembly of a section numbering (or likely soon to number) one-seventh of the whole—­a section seeking to lower the character of the assembly, and to derange its mechanism, with no further interest in the greater part of its business except that of preventing it from conducting that business—­this was the phenomenon which confronted us, and we felt that no rules of debate would overcome the dangers it threatened.

It is from this year 1882 that I date the impression which we formed, that Home Rule was sure to come.  “It may be a bold experiment,” we said to one another in the lobbies; “there are serious difficulties in the way, though the case for it is stronger than we thought two years ago.  But if the Irishmen persist as they are doing now, they will get it.  It is only a question of their tenacity.”

It was impossible not to be struck during the conflicts of 1881 and 1882 with the small amount of real bitterness which the conduct of the Irish members, irritating as it often was, provoked among the Liberals, who of course bore the brunt of the conflict.  The Nationalists did their best to injure a Government which was at the same time being denounced by the Tories as too favourable to Irish claims; they lowered the character of Parliament by scenes far more painful than those of the session of 1887, on which so much indignation has been lately expended; they said the hardest things they could think of against us in the House; they attacked us in our constituencies.  Their partisans (for I do not charge this on the leaders) interrupted and broke up our meetings.  Nevertheless, all this did not provoke responsive hatred from the Liberals.  There could not be a greater contrast than that between the way in which the great bulk of the Liberal members all through the Parliament of 1880 behaved towards their Irish antagonists, and the violence with which the Tory members, under much slighter provocation, conduct themselves towards those antagonists now.  I say this not to the credit of our temper, which was no better than that of other men heated by the