Bizarres” we find a modern continuation of the
Poe tradition, always more potent in France than elsewhere.
I have given this list of French writers of Short-stories
merely as evidence that the art flourishes in France
as well as in the United States, and not at all with
the view of recommending the fair readers of this
essaylet to send at once for the works of these French
writers, which are not always—indeed, one
may say not often—in exact accordance with
the conventionalities of Anglo-Saxon propriety.
The Short-story should not be void or without form,
but its form may be whatever the author please.
He has an absolute liberty of choice. It may be
a personal narrative, like Poe’s “Descent
into the Maelstrom” or Hale’s “My
Double, and How he Undid me;” it may be impersonal,
like Mr. F.B. Perkins’s “Devil-Puzzlers”
or Colonel De Forest’s “Brigade Commander;”
it may be a conundrum, like Mr. Stockton’s insoluble
query, “The Lady or the Tiger?” it may
be “A Bundle of Letters,” like Mr. James’s
story, or “A Letter and a Paragraph,”
like Mr. Bunner’s; it may be a medley of letters
and telegrams and narrative, like Mr. Aldrich’s
“Margery Daw;” it may be cast in any one
of these forms, or in a combination of all of them,
or in a wholly new form, if haply such may yet be found
by diligent search. Whatever its form, it should
have symmetry of design. If it have also wit
or humor, pathos or poetry, and especially a distinct
and unmistakable flavor of originality, so much the
better. But the chief requisites are compression,
originality, ingenuity, and now and again a touch
of fantasy. Sometimes we may detect in a writer
of Short-stories a tendency toward the over-elaboration
of ingenuity, toward the exhibition of ingenuity for
its own sake, as in a Chinese puzzle. But mere
cleverness is incompatible with greatness, and to
commend a writer as “very clever” is not
to give him high praise. From this fault of super-subtilty
women are free for the most part. They are more
likely than men to rely on broad human emotion, and
their tendency in error is toward the morbid analysis
of a high-strung moral situation.
BRANDER MATTHEWS.
* * * *
*
GENERAL GRANT AT FRANKFORT.
The extraordinary honors paid to General Grant in
England created a profound impression all over Europe.
No other American, and, indeed, few Europeans, had
ever received such honors abroad; and what made the
case still more impressive and exceptional was the
fact that this great distinction was paid to no potentate
or prince of the blood, but to a simple private citizen,
holding no rank or official position.
As soon as it was known that General Grant intended
to travel on the Continent, he was invited to visit
Frankfort-on-the-Main. The invitation was extended
by the American residents of that city, and was accepted.
A joint meeting of Americans and Frankfort burghers
was then held, and a committee was appointed, half
Germans and half Americans, to make arrangements for
the proposed reception and entertainment of General
Grant and his party. Mr. Henry Seligman, an American
banker of Frankfort, and the writer of this, were
appointed by this committee to intercept the distinguished
tourist on his journey up the Rhine and conduct him
to the city.