“Why, yes,” said the Rector, taking up the newspaper.  “Here is the `Trumpet’ accusing you of lagging behind—­did you see?”

“Eh? no,” said Mr. Brooke, dropping his gloves into his hat and hastily adjusting his eye-glass.  But Mr. Cadwallader kept the paper in his hand, saying, with a smile in his eyes—­

“Look here! all this is about a landlord not a hundred miles from Middlemarch, who receives his own rents.  They say he is the most retrogressive man in the county.  I think you must have taught them that word in the `Pioneer.’”

“Oh, that is Keek—­an illiterate fellow, you know.  Retrogressive, now!  Come, that’s capital.  He thinks it means destructive:  they want to make me out a destructive, you know,” said Mr. Brooke, with that cheerfulness which is usually sustained by an adversary’s ignorance.

“I think he knows the meaning of the word.  Here is a sharp stroke or two.  If we had to describe a man who is retrogressive in the most evil sense of the word—­we should say, he is one who would dub himself a reformer of our constitution, while every interest for which he is immediately responsible is going to decay:  a philanthropist who cannot bear one rogue to be hanged, but does not mind five honest tenants being half-starved:  a man who shrieks at corruption, and keeps his farms at rack-rent:  who roars himself red at rotten boroughs, and does not mind if every field on his farms has a rotten gate:  a man very open-hearted to Leeds and Manchester, no doubt; he would give any number of representatives who will pay for their seats out of their own pockets:  what he objects to giving, is a little return on rent-days to help a tenant to buy stock, or an outlay on repairs to keep the weather out at a tenant’s barn-door or make his house look a little less like an Irish cottier’s.  But we all know the wag’s definition of a philanthropist:  a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.  And so on.  All the rest is to show what sort of legislator a philanthropist is likely to make,” ended the Rector, throwing down the paper, and clasping his hands at the back of his head, while he looked at Mr. Brooke with an air of amused neutrality.

“Come, that’s rather good, you know,” said Mr. Brooke, taking up the paper and trying to bear the attack as easily as his neighbor did, but coloring and smiling rather nervously; “that about roaring himself red at rotten boroughs—­I never made a speech about rotten boroughs in my life.  And as to roaring myself red and that kind of thing—­ these men never understand what is good satire.  Satire, you know, should be true up to a certain point.  I recollect they said that in `The Edinburgh’ somewhere—­it must be true up to a certain point.”

“Well, that is really a hit about the gates,” said Sir James, anxious to tread carefully.  “Dagley complained to me the other day that he hadn’t got a decent gate on his farm.  Garth has invented a new pattern of gate—­I wish you would try it.  One ought to use some of one’s timber in that way.”