[Footnote 17:  Hirt equates Parjanya, Perkunas, Fjoergyn, as originally epithet of Dy[=a]ns-Zeus, with [Greek:  phegotaios], the ‘Oak-god.’  See also Zimmer, ZDA. vii. (19) 164.]

[Footnote 18:  Mueller explains Rudra as ‘howler’; Leo identifies him with Wuotan; Jones with Apollo, Kuhn.  KZ. iii. 335; as A. Sax.  Rodor, ib. ii. 478:  P. von Bradke.  ZDMG. xi. 361.  Oldenberg’s delineation of Rudra in Die Religion des Veda is based on the Brahmanic Rudra-Civa (see PAOS.  Dec 1894).]

     [Footnote 19:  Kerbaker, Varuna e gli Aditya (Naples,
     Proceedings of the Royal Academy) is known to us only by
     title.]

     [Footnote 20:  The author justly remarks that no sociological
     data can be made of Yama’s wife or sister.]

     [Footnote 21:  Dog sees Death, sharp sight of dog causes
     myth.]

[Footnote 22:  Other less important examples of etymological ingenuity are Scherer, Brahman as flamen ([Greek:  Brhagkos], Bragi, see Kaegi, Rig Veda, note 82); abhrad[=i]t[=a] as Aphrodite, Sonne, KZ. x. 415; Ahaly[=a] as Achilleus, Weber, Sitz.  Berl.  Ak., 1887; Id[=a] as Iris (Windischmann), Poseidon, potidas, i[=d.]aspati (Fick, KZ. xxi. 462); but in KZ. i. 459 Poseidon is patye davan.  On the form compare BB. viii. 80; x. 237; KZ. xxx. 570.  Prellwitz, BB. ix. 327, agrees with Fick and Pott as to i[d.]as representing [Greek:  oidma] and compares [prosklhotios].  Garga is Gorgo, Kern, JRAS. iv. 431; P[=a]jasya is Pegasos, etc, KZ. i. 416, xxix. 222; Parvata is Pelasgos, Burda, KZ. xxi. 470; but compare Stier, ib. xi. 229, where Pelasgoi are ‘cranes’; and Pische, ib. xx. 369, where they are [Greek:  parhrhhasioi].  Sabheya is Yavi[s.][t.]ha (not Hephaistos, as says Kuhn), Mueller, ib. xviii. 212; and v[r.]trahan is not Bellerophon (as says Pott), ib. iv. 416, v. 140 (bellero is varvara).  Carad is Ceres, Mueller, ib. xviii. 211; svav[=a]n is [Greek:  enas], Autrecht, ZDMG. xiii 499; svar ‘sing’ in Silenus, Siren:  Buddhaguru in Pythagoras, etc.  Helena is Saram[=a], and Hermes 1s S[=a]rameya.  Mueller, Chips, ii. 138, note.  Compare for further clever guesses Cox’s Aryan Mythology, Mueller’s Lectures, Second Series, and Biographies of Words.]

[Footnote 23:  Compare Deussen, Geschichte der Philosophie, i. 105.  On Vedic and Sanskrit Riddles, loc. cit.; also Haug, Vedische Raethselfragen (also Brahma und die Brahmanen); Fuehrer, ZDMG. xxxix. 99.]

     [Footnote 24:  There is an essay on this subject by Kern,
     Ind.  Theorieen over de Standenverdeeling, which we have not
     seen.]