It would seem, therefore, that to inculcate active kindness, simple morality, and the simplest creed were the most persuasive means of converting the Hindu, if the teacher unite with this a practical affection, without venturing upon ratiocination, and without seeking to attract by display, which at best cannot compete with native pageants.[43] Moreover, on the basis of undogmatic teaching, the missionary even now can unite with the Sam[=a]j and Sittar church, neither of which is of indigenous origin, though both are native in their secondary growth.  For it is significant that it is the Christian union of morality and altruism which has appealed to each of these religious bodies, and which each of them has made its own.  In insisting upon a strict morality the Christian missionary will be supported by the purest creeds of India itself, by Brahmanism, unsectarian Hinduism, the Jain heretics, and many others, all of whom either taught the same morality before Christianity existed, or developed it without Christian aid.  The strength of Christian teaching lies in uniting with this the practical altruism which was taught by Christ.  In her own religions there is no hope for India, and her best minds have renounced them.  The body of Hinduism is corrupt, its soul is evil.  As for Brahmanism—­the Brahmanism that produced the Upanishads—­the spirit is departed, and the form that remains is dead.  But a new spirit, the spirit of progress and of education, will prevail at last.  When it rules it will undo the bonds of caste and do away with low superstition.  Then India also will be free to accept, as the creed of her new religion, Christ’s words, ’Thou shalt love the Lord thy God, and thy neighbor as thyself.’  But to educate India up to this point will take many centuries, even more, perhaps, than will be needed to educate in the same degree Europe and America.[44]

* * * * *

FOOTNOTES: 

[Footnote 1:  Lassen interprets ophir as Abh[=i]ras, at the mouth of the Indus.  The biblical koph is Sanskrit kapi, ape.  Other doubtful equivalents are discussed by Weber, Indische Skizzen, p. 74.]

[Footnote 2:  The legend of the Flood and the fancy of the Four Ages has been attributed to Babylon by some writers.  Ecstein claims Chaldean influence in Indic atomic philosophy, Indische Studien, ii. 369, which is doubtful; but the Indic alphabet probably derived thence, possibly from Greece.  The conquests of Semiramis (Serimamis in the original) may have included a part of India, but only Brunnhofer finds trace of this in Vedic literature, and the character of his work we have already described.]

     [Footnote 3:  Senart attributes to the Achaemenides certain
     Indic formulae of administration.  IA. xx. 256.]