But native scholars make but a small part of the population, and among the uneducated and ‘depressed’ classes there is plenty for the missionary to do.  Here, too, where caste is hated because these classes suffer from it, there is more effect in preaching equality and the brotherly love of Christianity, doctrines abhorrent to the social aristocrats, and not favored even by the middle classes.  But what here opposes Christian efforts is the splendid system of devotion, the magnificent fetes, the gorgeous shows, and the tickling ritualism, which please and overawe the fancy of the native, who is apt to desire for himself a pageant of religion, not to speak of a visible god in idol form; while from his religious teacher he demands either an asceticism which is no part of the Christian faith, or a leadership in sensuous and sensual worship.

What will be the result of proselytizing zeal among these variegated masses?[41] Evidently this depends on where and how it is exercised.  The orthodox theologian will not give up his inherited faith for one that to him is on a par with a schismatic heresy, or take dogmatic instruction from a level which he regards as intellectually below his own.  From the Sam[=a]jas no present help will come to the missionary; for, while they have already accepted the spirit of Christianity, liberal Hindus reject the Christian creed.[42] At a later day they will join hands with the missionary, perhaps, but not before the latter is prepared to say:  There is but one God, and many are his prophets.

There remain such of the higher classes as can be induced to prefer undogmatic Christianity to polytheism, and the lowest class, which may be persuaded by acts of kindness to accept the dogmas with which these are accompanied.  It is with this class that the missionary has succeeded best.  In other cases his success has been in inverse ratio to the amount of his dogmatic teaching.  And this we believe to be the key to the second problem.  For, if one examine the maze of India’s tangled creeds, he will be surprised to find that, though dogmatic Christianity has its Indic representative, there yet is no indigenous representative of undogmatic Christianity.  For a god in human form is worshipped, and a trinity is revered; but this is not Christianity.  Love of man is preached; but this is not Christianity.  Love of God and faith in his earthly incarnation is taught; but this, again, is not Christianity.  No sect has ever formulated as an original doctrine Christ’s two indissoluble commandments, on which hang all the law and the prophets.