his eyes were grey, sometimes arrogant but usually amiable in expression.  His personality corresponded perfectly to his appearance.  His countenance showed his character, and his character was a witness to the truth of his physiognomy.  Nothing was contradictory, perfect was the harmony between the inner and the outer man, between the nobility of thought and the simple dignity, well-poised and graceful.  Among the great ones of this earth, he was like a star in heaven.  Every line proclaimed “I am a prince and a man unique.”

It was for his bearing rather than his beauty that he commanded universal admiration.  In a stable he would have looked like an image in a temple.  In a hall he was the decoration.  Whereever his body was, there, too, was his spirit, ready for the demands of the hour.  He was singularly joyous and nicely tempered in speech with so much personal magnetism that he could mollify any enemy if he could only meet him face to face.  His dress was always rich and appropriate.  He was skilful in horsemanship, in archery, and in tennis, but his chief amusement was the chase.  He liked to linger at the table and demanded good serving but was really moderate in his tastes, as often he neglected pheasant for a bit of Mayence ham or salted beef.  Oaths and abuse were never heard from him.  To all alike his speech was courteous even when there was nothing to be gained.

“Never, I assert, did falsehood pass his lips, his mouth was equal to his seal and his spoken word to his written.  Loyal as fine gold and whole as an egg.”  Chastellain repeats himself somewhat in the profusion of his eulogy, but such are the main points of his characterisation.  Then he proceeds to some qualifications: 

“In order to avoid the charge of flattery, I acknowledge that he had faults.  None is perfect except God.  Often he was very careless in administration, and he neglected questions of justice, of finance, and of commerce in a way that may redound to the injury of his house.  The excuse urged is that it was his deputies who were at fault.  The answer to that is that he trusted too much to deputies and should not be excused for his confidence.  A ruler ought to understand his business himself.

“Also he had the vices of the flesh.  He pleased his heart at the desire of his eyes.  At the desire of his heart he multiplied his pleasures.  His wishes were easy to attain.  What he wanted was offered freely.  He neglected the virtuous and holy lady his wife, a Christian saint, chaste and charitable.  For this I offer no excuse.  To God I leave the cause.

“Another fault was that he was not wise in his treatment of his nobles.  Especially in his old age he often preferred the less worthy, the less capable advisers.  The answer to this charge is that, as his health failed, whoever was by his side obtained ascendency over him and succeeded in keeping the others at a distance.