erected (in 1752) in King Street, leading out of New
Street, near to the Free School, which, being enlarged
in 1774, is described by Hutton as having few equals.
In this year also (1774) the Theatre Royal was erected
(at a cost of nearly L5,700) though the latter half
of its title was not assumed until August, 1807, on
the occasion of the Royal assent being given to the
house being “licensed.” A bill had
been introduced into the House of Commons for this
purpose on the 26th of March, 1777, during the debate
on which Burke called Birmingham “the great
toyshop of Europe,” but it was thrown out on
the second reading. The King Street Theatre,
like its predecessor in Moor Street, after a time
of struggle, was turned into a place of worship in
1786, a fate which, at a later date, also befell another
place of public entertainment, the Circus, in Bradford
Street, and the theatrical history of the town, for
a long term of years centred round the Theatre Royal,
though now and then spasmodic attempts were made to
localise amusements more or less of a similar nature.
One of these, and the earliest, was peculiarly unfortunate;
early in 1778 a wooden pavilion, known as the “Concert
Booth,” was erected in the Moseley Road, dramatic
performances being given between the first and
last parts of a vocal and instrumental concert, but
some mischievous or malicious incendiary set fire
to the building, which was burnt to the ground Aug.
13 of the same year. Four years later, and nearly
at the same date (Aug. 17) the Theatre in New Street
met with a like fate, the only portion of it left
being the stone front (added in 1780) which is still
the same, fortunately coming almost as safely through
the next conflagration. The proprietors cleared
away the ruins, and erected a more commodious structure,
which, under the management of Mr. William Macready,
was opened June 22, 1795. In the meantime, the
King Street Theatre having been chapelised, the town
appears to have been without any recognised place
for dramatic entertainments other than those provided
in the large rooms of the hotels, or the occasional
use of a granary transmogrified for the nonce into
a Thespian arena. On the night of the 6th of January,
1820, after the performance of “Pizarro,”
the Theatre Royal was again burnt out, but, possibly
from having their property insured up to L7,000, the
proprietors were not so long in having it rebuilt,
the doors of the new house being opened on following
Aug. 14. This is, practically, the same building
as the present, which has scats for about 3,500, the
gallery holding 1,000. Many of the first artists
of the profession have trod the boards of the Old
Theatre since the last-named date, and Birmingham
has cause to be proud of more than one of her children,
who, starting thence, have found name and fame elsewhere.
The scope of the present work will not allow of anything
move than a few brief notes, and those entirely of
local bearing, but a history of the Birmingham stage
would not be uninteresting reading.