he then held no official position, were occupying
a great deal of his time and thoughts in view of future
Federation. It was, therefore, marvellous to
see him putting his whole mind to such matters as his
prize poultry and beasts at the home farm, to the
disposing of the same in what he termed “my
country,” or to the arranging of his priceless
collection of glass—even to the question
of a domicile for the baby lioness lately presented
to him. Again, one moment he might be talking
of De Beers business, involving huge sums of money,
the next discussing the progress of his thirty fruit-farms
in the Drakenstein district, where he had no fewer
than 100,000 fruit-trees; another time his horse-breeding
establishment at Kimberley was engaging his attention,
or, nearer home, the road-making and improvements
at Groot Schuurr, where he even knew the wages paid
to the 200 Cape boys he was then employing. Mr.
Rhodes was always in favour of doing things on a large
scale, made easy, certainly, by his millionaire’s
purse. Sometimes a gardener or bailiff would
ask for two or three dozen rose or fruit trees.
“There is no use,” he would exclaim impatiently,
“in two dozen of anything. My good man,
you should count in hundreds and thousands, not dozens.
That is the only way to produce any effect or to make
any profit.” Another of his theories was
that people who dwelt in or near towns never had sufficient
fresh air. During one of our morning rides I remember
his stopping a telegraph-boy, and asking him where
he lived. When the lad had told him, he said:
“I suppose there are no windows in your cottage;
you had better go to Rhodesia, where you will find
space, and where you won’t get cramped ideas.”
Then he rode on, leaving the boy staring at him with
open eyes. An attractive attribute was his love
of his early associations, his father especially being
often the theme of his conversation. He used
freely to express his admiration for the type the
latter represented, now almost extinct, of the old-fashioned
country clergyman-squire. He held with tenacity
to the traditions of his childhood in having always
a cold supper on Sunday evenings, instead of the usual
elaborate dinner, also in having the cloth removed
for dessert, to display the mahogany, of which, alas!
few of our tables are now made. With stupidity,
or anything thereto approaching, he was apt to be
impatient; neither could he stand young men who affected
indifference to, or boredom with, the events and sights
of the day. I often used to think, however, he
frightened people, and that they did not show to their
best advantage, nor was their intelligence at its brightest
when talking with him. I now refer especially
to those in his employ.