Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 332 pages of information about Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft.

Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 332 pages of information about Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft.

Such as it was, the popular system of the Celts easily received the northern admixture of Drows and Duergar, which gave the belief, perhaps, a darker colouring than originally belonged to the British fairyland.  It was from the same source also, in all probability, that additional legends were obtained of a gigantic and malignant female, the Hecate of this mythology, who rode on the storm and marshalled the rambling host of wanderers under her grim banner.  This hag (in all respects the reverse of the Mab or Titania of the Celtic creed) was called Nicneven in that later system which blended the faith of the Celts and of the Goths on this subject.  The great Scottish poet Dunbar has made a spirited description of this Hecate riding at the head of witches and good neighbours (fairies, namely), sorceresses and elves, indifferently, upon the ghostly eve of All-Hallow Mass.[26] In Italy we hear of the hags arraying themselves under the orders of Diana (in her triple character of Hecate, doubtless) and Herodias, who were the joint leaders of their choir.  But we return to the more simple fairy belief, as entertained by the Celts before they were conquered by the Saxons.

[Footnote 26:  See “Flyting of Dunbar and Kennedy.”]

Of these early times we can know little; but it is singular to remark what light the traditions of Scotland throw upon the poetry of the Britons of Cumberland, then called Reged.  Merlin Wyllt, or the wild, is mentioned by both; and that renowned wizard, the son of an elf or fairy, with King Arthur, the dubious champion of Britain at that early period, were both said by tradition to have been abstracted by the fairies, and to have vanished without having suffered death, just at the time when it was supposed that the magic of the wizard and the celebrated sword of the monarch, which had done so much to preserve British independence, could no longer avert the impending ruin.  It may be conjectured that there was a desire on the part of Arthur or his surviving champions to conceal his having received a mortal wound in the fatal battle of Camlan; and to that we owe the wild and beautiful incident so finely versified by Bishop Percy, in which, in token of his renouncing in future the use of arms, the monarch sends his attendant, sole survivor of the field, to throw his sword Excalibar into the lake hard by.  Twice eluding the request, the esquire at last complied, and threw the far-famed weapon into the lonely mere.  A hand and arm arose from the water and caught Excalibar by the hilt, flourished it thrice, and then sank into the lake.[27] The astonished messenger returned to his master to tell him the marvels he had seen, but he only saw a boat at a distance push from the land, and heard shrieks of females in agony:—­

“And whether the king was there or not
  He never knew, he never colde
 For never since that doleful day
  Was British Arthur seen on molde.”

[Footnote 27:  See “Percy’s Reliques of Ancient English Poetry.”]

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.