and the same result is only a matter of time in British countries.  The registration of voters is not yet conducted in the same rigid manner as in America, nor is the farce of holding a primary election gone through; but whether the control be exercised by a political organization, a newspaper, a local committee, or a secret society, the principle is the same.  Mr. Bryce has noticed the rapid change in the practice of England on this point:—­“As late as the general elections of 1868 and 1874 nearly all candidates offered themselves to the constituency, though some professed to do so in pursuance of requisitions emanating from the electors.  In 1880 many—­I think most—­Liberal candidates in boroughs and some in counties were chosen by the local party associations, and appealed to the Liberal electors on the ground of having been so chosen.  In 1885, and again in 1892, all, or nearly all, new Liberal candidates were so chosen, and a man offering himself against the nominee of the association was denounced as an interloper and traitor to the party.  The same process has been going on in the Tory party, though more slowly.  The influence of the locally wealthy, and also that of the central party office, is somewhat greater among the Tories, but in course of time choice by representative associations will doubtless become the rule."[5] Is it to be expected that this power will not be abused as in America?  The trouble is that no association can represent all the party electors, and that the representative becomes responsible to the managers of the association, to whom he really owes his election.  Any control of this kind is fatal to the principle of responsible leadership.  And yet the only alternative with the present method of election is the break-up of the party system.  This is the dilemma in which all modern democracies are placed.  The evil will be completely obviated by the reform.  Instead of limiting the candidates, it will be to the advantage of each party to induce the strongest and most popular candidates to stand on its behalf, since the number of seats it will obtain depends only on the aggregate votes polled by all the candidates.  With individual candidature there can be no “machine” control of nominations.  All are free to appeal directly to the people.

+Localization of Politics.+—­The local delegate is unfortunately the prevailing type of Australian politician.  The value of a member is too often measured by the services he renders to his constituents individually or the amount of money he can get the Government to spend in his constituency.  Hence the nefarious practice of log-rolling in Parliament.  Is it any wonder that some of the colonies promise to rival France in the proportion of unreproductive works constructed out of loan money?