It is hard to say, when one begins to make alterations in an old house, how far one will be led on in rebuilding, and I doubt whether this change in the present American system, possibly in itself desirable, might not be found to involve a reconstruction large enough to put a new face upon several parts of that system.  (Vol. i, pp. 290, 291.)

This is very true, but is not a new building required?  Is not the old house built on a rotten foundation?  Mr. Bradford has certainly overlooked the effect of his proposal on party organization for one thing.  If the power over legislation, and especially over expenditure of public money, is to be taken away from the irresponsible committees of Congress, the basis of party organization would cease to be corruption, and both representatives and parties would have to take on an entirely new character.  As to the present character of representatives, Mr. Bryce advances a number of reasons why the best men do not go in for politics, such as the want of a social and commercial capital, the residential qualification, the comparative dullness of politics, the attractiveness of other careers, &c, but Mr. Bradford declares that the one explanation which goes further than all these is the absorption of all the powers of the government by the legislature, and the consequent suppression of individuality.  He writes:—­

The voters are urged to send to Congress men of character, ability, and public spirit.  They might as well be asked to select men of that quality to follow the profession of burglars, a comparison which is not intended to convey any disrespect to the number of honest and respectable men who constantly are sent to Congress.  Chosen as burglars, they would fail just the same in the business....  It is the organization of Congress which offers every facility to those who wish to buy and those who wish to be bought.

Again, as to the present character of parties, Mr. Bradford declares:—­

     The names of the two great parties, Republicans and Democrats, have
     in themselves and at the present time no meaning at all.

Simply because the basis of organization is corruption, and not questions of public policy.  For the same reason recent elections have been fought on popular “crazes,” such as the silver question.  But Mr. Bradford says:—­

New parties cannot be formed on constantly changing issues, since to have any strength they must have a certain degree of permanence.  The only two nations which have succeeded in forming great national parties are Great Britain and the United States.  In other European countries the splitting into groups has almost made representative government impossible.

What Mr. Bradford has failed to appreciate is that the absolutely rigid division into two camps which prevails in America is founded on corruption, and will disappear when corruption is abolished.  In