Note now ‘the hope that the creation itself also,’ as something besides and other than God’s men and women, ’shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption, into the liberty of the glory of the children of God.’  The creation then is to share in the deliverance and liberty and glory of the children of God.  Deliverance from corruption, liberty from bondage, must include escape from the very home and goal of corruption, namely death,—­and that in all its kinds and degrees.  When you say then that for the children of God there is no more death, remember that the deliverance of the creature is from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.  Dead, in bondage to corruption, how can they share in the liberty of the children of Life?  Where is their deliverance?

If such then be the words of the apostle, does he, or does he not, I ask, hold the idea of the immortality of the animals?  If you say all he means is, that the creatures alive at the coming of the Lord will be set free from the tyranny of corrupt man, I refer you to what I have already said of the poverty of such an interpretation, accepting the failure of justice and love toward those that have passed away, are passing, and must yet, ere that coming, be born to pass away for ever.  For the man whose heart aches to adore a faithful creator, what comfort lies in such good news!  He must perish for lack of a true God!  Oh lame conclusion to the grand prophecy!  Is God a mocker, who will not be mocked?  Is there a past to God with which he has done?  Is Time too much for him?  Is he God enough to care for those that happen to live at one present time, but not God enough to care for those that happened to live at another present time?  Or did he care for them, but could not help them?  Shall we not rather believe that the vessels of less honour, the misused, the maltreated, shall be filled full with creative wine at last?  Shall not the children have little dogs under the Father’s table, to which to let fall plenty of crumbs?  If there was such provision for the sparrows of our Lord’s time of sojourn, and he will bring yet better with him when he comes again, how should the dead sparrows and their sorrows be passed over of him with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning?  Or would the deliverance of the creatures into the groaned-for liberty have been much worth mentioning, if within a few years their share in the glory of the sons of God was to die away in death?  But the gifts of God are without repentance.

How St Paul longs for and loves liberty!  Only true lover of liberty is he, who will die to give it to his neighbour!  St Paul loved liberty more than his own liberty.  But then see how different his notion of the liberty on its way to the children of God, from the dull modern fancies of heaven still set forth in the popular hymn-books!  The new heaven and the new earth will at least be a heaven and an earth!  What would the newest earth be to the old children without its animals?  Barer than the heavens emptied of the constellations that are called by their names.  Then, if the earth must have its animals, why not the old ones, already dear?  The sons of God are not a new race of sons of God, but the old race glorified:—­why a new race of animals, and not the old ones glorified?