names, as Russians, Poles, Silesians, Czekhes, Moravians,
Sorabians, Servians, Morlachians, Czernogortzi, Bulgarians;
nay, when most of them imitating foreigners altered
the general name
Slovene into
Slavene,
only those two Slavic branches, which touch each other
on the banks of the Danube, the
Slovaks and
the
Slovenzi, have retained in its purity their
original national name.”—According
to Schaffarik’s later opinion, as expressed
in his
Antiquities, the appellation Slavi, Slaveni,
or Slovenians, is derived from one of their seats,
that is, the country on the Upper Niemen, where the
Stloveni or
Sueveni of Ptolemy lived.
It is said to be called by the Finns
Sallo (like
every woodland); by the Lithuanians,
Sallawa, Slawa;
in old Prussian,
Salava; by the neighbouring
Germans,
Schalauen; in Latin,
Scalavia.
But it seems a more natural conclusion, that
vice
versa the name of the district was rather derived
from Slavic settlers living in the midst of a German,
Russian, and Finnish population—For the
derivation from
slovo, word, speech, the circumstance
seems to speak, that in most Slavic languages the
appellation for a German (and formerly for all foreigners)
is
Njemetz,
i.e. one dumb, an impotent,
nameless, speechless person. What more natural,
in a primitive stage of culture, than to consider
only those as speaking, who are
understood;
and those who seem to utter unmeaning sounds, as dumb,
impotent beings?]
[Footnote 6: The earliest Slavic historian is
the Russian monk Nestor, born in the year 1056.
See below, in the History of the Old Slavic
and of the Russian languages. The reader
will there see, that even the authority and age of
this writer has been in our days attacked by the hypercritical
spirit of the modern Russian Historical school.]
[Footnote 7: See Goerres’ Mythengeschichte
der Asiatischen Welt, Heidelb. 1810. Kayssarov’s
Versuch einer Slavischen Mythologie, Goetting.
1804. Dobrovsky’s Slavia, new edit.
by W. Hanka, Prague 1834, p. 263-275. Durich
Bibliotheca Slavica, Buda 1795. J. Potocki’s
Voyages dans quelques parties de la Basse Saxe pour
la recherche des antiquites Slaves, Hamb. 1795.
J.J. Hanusch, Wissenschaft des Slavischen
Mythus. Lemberg, 1842.]
[Footnote 8: Glagolita Clozianus, Vindob.
1836.]
[Footnote 9: Vol. II. p. 1610 sq.]
[Footnote 10: Schaffarik in his Slavic Ethnography,
published nearly twenty years after his “History
of the Slavic Language and Literature,” omits
the word “North,” and divides the Slavi
into the “Western,” and “South-Eastern"
nations. He must mean the Western, and
the Southern AND Eastern.].
[Footnote 11: We acknowledge, however, that even
this latter appellation admits of some restriction
in respect to the Slovenzi or Windes of Carniola and
Carinthia; who, notwithstanding their rather Western
situation, belong to the Eastern race.]