himself, though he wrote Church music in a serious,
reverential spirit, could not detach himself from
his age and get back to the sublime religious ecstasy
of Byrde. He seizes upon the texts to paint vivid
descriptive pieces; he thrills you with lovely passages
or splendours of choral writing; but he did not try
to express devotional moods that he never felt.
A mood very close to that of religious ecstasy finds
a voice in “Thou knowest, Lord, the Secrets
of our Hearts”—the mood of a man clean
rapt away from all earthly affairs, and standing face
to face, alone, with the awful mystery of “the
infinite and eternal energy from which all things
proceed.” It is plain, direct four-part
choral writing, but the accent is terrible in its
distinctness. At Queen Mary’s funeral (we
can judge from Tudway’s written reflections)
the audience was overwhelmed, and we may believe it.
A more elaborately wrought and longer piece of work
is the setting of the Latin Psalm, “Jehova, quam
multi sunt.” It is the high-water mark of
all Church music after the polyphonists. By Church
music I mean music written for the Church, not necessarily
religious music. The passage at “Ego cubui
et dormivi” is sublime, Purcell’s discords
creating an atmosphere of strange beauty, almost unearthly,
and that yields to the unspeakable tenderness of the
naive phrase at the words, “Quia Jehovah sustentat
me.” The Te Deum was until recently
known only by Dr. Boyce’s perversion. Dr.
Boyce is reputed to have been an estimable moral character,
and it is to be hoped he was, for that is the best
we can say of him. He was a dunderheaded worshipper
and imitator of Handel. Thinking that Purcell
had tried to write in the Handelian bow-wow, and for
want of learning had not succeeded; thinking also
that he, Dr. Boyce, being a musical doctor, had that
learning, he took Purcell’s music in hand, and
soon put it all right—turned it, that is,
into a clumsy, forcible-feeble copy of Handel.
One could scarcely recognise Purcell so blunderingly
disguised. However, we now know better, and the
Te Deum stands before us, pure Purcell, in
all its beauty, freshness, sheer strength, and, above
all, naive direct mode of utterance. It looks
broken, but does not sound broken. Purcell simply
went steadily through the canticle, setting each verse
as he came to it to the finest music possible.
The song “Vouchsafe, O Lord,” is an unmatched
setting of the words for the solo alto, full of very
human pathos; and some of the choral parts are even
more brilliant than the odes. The Jubilate
is almost as fine; but we must take both, not as premature
endeavours to work Handelian wonders, but as the full
realisations of a very different ideal. THE FOUR-PART
SONATAS.