Every one of these circumstances, and many others, which might be stated from Mr. Morrison’s Journal, are omitted in Bligh’s published narrative; but many of them are alluded to in his original Journal, and others that prove distinctly the constant reproofs to which his officers were subject, and the bad terms on which they stood with their commander.  A few extracts from this Journal will sufficiently establish this point.

In so early a part of the voyage as their arrival in Adventure Bay, he found fault with his officers, and put the carpenter into confinement.  Again, at Matavai Bay, on the 5th December, Bligh says, ’I ordered the carpenter to cut a large stone that was brought off by one of the natives, requesting me to get it made fit for them to grind their hatchets on, but to my astonishment he refused, in direct terms, to comply, saying, “I will not cut the stone, for it will spoil my chisel; and though there may be law to take away my clothes, there is none to take away my tools.”  This man having before shown his mutinous and insolent behaviour, I was under the necessity of confining him to his cabin.’

On the 5th January three men deserted in the cutter, on which occasion Bligh says, ’Had the mate of the watch been awake, no trouble of this kind would have happened.  I have therefore disrated and turned him before the mast; such neglectful and worthless petty officers, I believe, never were in a ship as are in this.  No orders for a few hours together are obeyed by them, and their conduct in general is so bad, that no confidence or trust can be reposed in them; in short, they have driven me to every thing but corporal punishment, and that must follow if they do not improve.’

By Morrison’s Journal it would appear that ‘corporal punishment’ was not long delayed; for, on the very day, he says, the midshipman was put in irons, and confined from the 5th January to the 23rd March—­eleven weeks!

On the 17th January, orders being given to clear out the sail-room and to air the sails, many of them were found very much mildewed and rotten in many places, on which he observes, ’If I had any officers to supersede the master and boatswain, or was capable of doing without them, considering them as common seamen, they should no longer occupy their respective stations; scarcely any neglect of duty can equal the criminality of this.’

On the 24th January, the three deserters were brought back and flogged, then put in irons for further punishment.  ‘As this affair,’ he says, ’was solely caused by the neglect of the officers who had the watch, I was induced to give them all a lecture on this occasion, and endeavour to show them that, however exempt they were at present from the like punishment, yet they were equally subject, by the articles of war, to a condign one.’  He then tells them, that it is only necessity that makes him have recourse to reprimand, because there are no means of trying them by court-martial; and adds a remark, not very intelligible, but what he calls an unpleasant one, about such offenders having no feelings of honour or sense of shame.