connecting railroads. Many of the states sought
to forbid the companies from charging more than two
cents a mile for passenger fares. The issuing
of passes except under severe restrictions was made
illegal. The railroad companies were suddenly
confronted by a mass of hostile and conflicting legislation
which represented for the most part an honest attempt
to fulfill a neglected responsibility, but whose effort
on the whole merely embarrassed the operations of the
roads, and which in many instances failed to protect
the real public interests involved. Even when
this legislation was not ignorantly and unwisely conceived,
and even when it was prepared by well-informed and
well-intentioned men, it was informed by contradictory
ideas and a false conception of the genuine abuses
and their necessary remedies. Consequently, a
certain fraction of intelligent and disinterested public
opinion began soon to realize that the results of a
vigorous attempt on the part of the state governments
to use their powers and to fulfill their responsibilities
in respect to the railroads were actually worse and
more dangerous to the public interest than was the
previous neglect. The neglect of the responsibility
implied corruption, because it provoked blackmail.
The vigorous fulfillment of the responsibility implied
confusion, cross-purposes, and excessive severity,
because the powers of a single state were too great
within its specific jurisdiction and absolutely negligible
beyond.
The railroad companies suffer more from this piecemeal
and conflicting regulation than do corporations engaged
in manufacturing operations, not only because they
discharge a peculiarly public function, but because
their business, particularly in its rate-making aspect,
suffers severely from any division by arbitrary geographical
lines. But all large inter-state corporations
are more or less in the same situation. Corporations
such as the Standard Oil Company and some of the large
New York life insurance companies are confronted by
the alternative either of going out of business in
certain states, or of submitting to restrictions which
would compromise the efficiency of their whole business
policy. Doubtless they have not exhausted the
evasive and dilatory methods which have served them
so well in the past; but little by little the managers
of these corporations are coming to realize that they
are losing more than they gain from subjection to so
many conflicting and supplementary jurisdictions.
Little by little they are coming to realize that the
only way in which their businesses can obtain a firm
legal standing is by means of Federal recognition and
exclusive Federal regulation. They would like
doubtless to continue to escape any effective regulation
at all; but without it they cannot obtain effective
recognition, and in the existing ferment of public
opinion recognition has become more important to them
than regulation is dangerous.