gold and silver were conveyed by railway from London to Paris.  A cast of the key was taken in wax, and it was copied in iron.  It was by means of this key that “The Great Gold Robbery” was effected.  After some time the thieves were apprehended, and the person who had stolen the key—­the keeper-up of appearances, then Manager of the Royal Swedish Railway—­was apprehended, convicted, and sentenced by Baron Martin to Transportation for Life.

The Rev. John Davis, the late Chaplain of Newgate, published the following among other accounts of the causes of crime among the convicted young men who came under his notice:—­

“I knew a youth, the child of an officer in the navy, who had served his country with distinction, but whose premature death rendered his widow thankful To receive an official appointment for her delicate boy in a Government office.  His income from the office was given faithfully to his mother; and it was a pleasure and a pride to him to gladden her heart by the thought that he was helping her.  She had other children—­two little girls, just rising from the cradle to womanhood.  Her scanty pension and his salary made every one happy.  But over this youth came a love of dress.  He had not strength of mind to see how much more truly beautiful a pure mind is, than a finely decorated exterior.  He took pleasure in helping his mother and sisters, but did not take greater pleasure in thinking that to do this kindness to them he must be contented for a time to dress a little worse than his fellow-clerks; his clothes might appear a little worn, but they were like the spot on the dress of a soldier arising from the discharge of duty; they were no marks of undue carelessness; necessity had wrought them; and while they indicated necessity, they marked also the path of honour, and without such spots duty must have been neglected.  But this youth did not think of such great thoughts as these.  He felt ashamed at his threadbare but clean coat.  The smart, new-shining dress of other clerks mortified him....  He wanted to appear finer.  In an evil hour he ordered a suit of clothes from a fashionable tailor.  His situation and connections procured him a short credit.  But tradesmen must be paid, and he was again and again importuned to defray his debt.  To relieve himself of his creditor he stole a letter containing a L10 note.  His tailor was paid, but the injured party knew the number of the note.  It was traced to the tailor, by him to the thief, with the means and opportunity of stealing it, and in a few days he was transported.  His handsome dress was exchanged for the dress of a convict.  Better by far would it have been for him to have worn his poorer garb, with the marks of honest labour upon it.  He formed only another example of the intense folly of love of dress, which, exists quite as much amongst foolish young men as amongst foolish young women.”