This is what Mr. D’Israeli calls “a patriotic quotation from Lord Clare.”

It would seem to me that any impartial reader of the Liberator’s speech on this occasion would regard it as an iteration of the whole policy of his career, rather than an abnegation of it; but smooth and kind as Mr. D’Israeli’s words appear, it is manifest he did not forget their ancient feud, and he therefore adroitly tries to give a parting stab, ungenerous as it was false, to the expiring lion.

That portion of the Tory party which remained faithful to Protection, being deserted by their leaders, rallied round Lord George Bentinck, and in some sense forced him to become their champion against their late chief, the Premier, and his policy.  Thus was formed the Protectionist party, strictly so called.  This party being of opinion that there was sufficient necessity for the Government Coercion Bill were in “great difficulty to find a plausible pretext for opposing it.”  Lord George himself hit upon one.  The party held a meeting at the house of Mr. Bankes, and after anxious discussion on the part of many members present, Lord George at last spoke.  He said “he was for giving the Government a hearty support, provided they proved they were in earnest in their determination to put down murder and outrage in Ireland, by giving priority in the conduct of public business to the measure in question,”—­the Coercion Bill.[92] This was ingenious.  The party supported what was called public order in Ireland, but with a proviso that might eventually defeat free trade by postponement.  After some finessing, the Government showed a determination to go on with both bills.  Lord John Russell and the Whigs saw their opportunity, and to the dismay of the First Lord, he found the strange, incongruous, unprecedented combination of Irish Repealers, Tory Protectionists, Whigs, and Manchester League-men prepared to vote against him on his Irish Coercion Act.  The debate on it occupied six nights.  It was closed on the 25th of June by Mr. Cobden; the division was taken, and the Government was left in a minority of SEVENTY THREE.  It was a memorable night in the life of Sir Robert Peel.  Although a night of defeat, it was also a night of triumph for him; for, two hours before the division, and whilst the debate was going on, Commissioners from the House of Lords announced to the Commons that their lordships had finally passed the bill for the repeal of the Corn Laws.  It was the law of the land!  Writing to Lord Harding, Governor-General of India, ten days afterwards, Sir Robert says:  “You will see that we are out—­defeated by a combination of Whigs and Protectionists.  A much less emphatic hint would have sufficed for me.  I would not have held office by sufferance for a week....  There are no secrets.  We have fallen in the face of day, and with our front to to our enemies.  There is nothing I would not have done to ensure the carrying of the measure I had proposed this session.  I pique myself on