III. made use of it in certain parts of his temple
at Medinet Habu; but, as a rule, it was preferred for
stelae and small monuments. The last-named method
lessened not only the danger of damage to the work,
but the labour of the workman. It evaded the dressing
down of the background, which was a distinct economy
of time, and it left no projecting work on the surface
of the walls, the design being thus sheltered from
accidental blows. The intermediate process was,
however, generally adopted, and appears to have been
taught in the schools by preference. The models
were little rectangular tablets, squared off in order
that the scholar might enlarge or reduce the scale
of his subject without departing from the traditional
proportions. Some of these models are wrought
on both sides; but the greater number are sculptured
on one side only. Sometimes the design represents
a bull; sometimes the head of a cynocephalous ape,
of a ram, of a lion, of a divinity. Occasionally,
we find the subject in duplicate, side by side, being
roughly blocked out to the left, and highly finished
to the right. In no instance does the relief
exceed a quarter of an inch, and it is generally even
less. Not but that the Egyptians sometimes cut
boldly into the stone. At Medinet Habu and Karnak—on
the higher parts of these temples, where the work is
in granite or sandstone, and exposed to full daylight—the
bas-relief decoration projects full 6-3/8 inches above
the surface. Had it been lower, the tableaux
would have been, as it were, absorbed by the flood
of light poured upon them, and to the eye of the spectator
would have presented only a confused network of lines.
The models designed for the study of the round are
even more instructive than the rest. Some which
have come down to us are plaster casts of familiar
subjects. The head, the arms, the legs, the trunk,
each part of the body, in short, was separately cast.
If a complete figure were wanted, the disjecta
membra were put together, and the result was a
statue of a man, or of a woman, kneeling, standing,
seated, squatting, the arms extended or falling passively
by the sides. This curious collection was discovered
at Tanis, and dates probably from Ptolemaic times.[38]
Models of the Pharaonic ages are in soft limestone,
and nearly all represent portraits of reigning sovereigns.
These are best described as cubes measuring about
ten inches each way. The work was begun by covering
one face of a cube with a network of lines crossing
each other at right angles; these regulated the relative
position of the features. Then the opposite side
was attacked, the distances being taken from the scale
on the reverse face. A mere oval was designed
on this first block; a projection in the middle and
a depression to right and left, vaguely indicating
the whereabouts of nose and eyes. The forms become
more definite as we pass from cube to cube, and the
face emerges by degrees. The limit of the contours
is marked off by parallel lines cut vertically from