seem to advise, I have no thought whatever [longe
absum]: they are worthier of silence than
of commemoration. What is needed is not one to
compile a good history of our troubles, but one
who can happily end the troubles themselves; for,
with you, I fear lest, amid these our civil discords,
or rather sheer madnesses, we shall seem to the lately
confederated enemies of Liberty and Religion a too
fit object of attack, though in truth they have
not yet inflicted a severer wound on Religion than
we ourselves have been long doing by our crimes.
But God, as I hope, on His own account, and for His
own glory, now in question, will not allow the counsels
and onsets of the enemy to succeed as they themselves
wish, whatever convulsions Kings and Cardinals meditate
and design. Meanwhile, for the Protestant Synod
of Loudun, which you tell me is so soon to meet
[Milton does not seem to know that it had been sitting
already for six weeks] I pray—what has
never happened to any Synod yet—a happy
issue, not of the Nazianzenian sort,[1] and am of opinion
that the issue of this one will be happy enough if,
should they decree nothing else, they should decree
the expulsion of Morus. Of my posthumous adversary,
as soon as he makes his appearance, be good enough
to give me the earliest information. Farewell.
“Westminster: December 20, 1659.”
[Footnote 1: The allusion seems to be to the great OEcumenical Council of Constantinople in 381, which confirmed Gregory Nazianzen in the Patriarchate of Constantinople, and in which Gregory presided for some time and inefficiently.]
TO THE NOBLE YOUTH, RICHARD JONES.
“For the long break in your correspondence with me your excuses are truly most modest, inasmuch as you might with more justice accuse me of the same fault; and, as the case stands, I am really at a loss to know whether I should have preferred your not having been in fault to your having apologised so finely. On no account let it ever come into your mind that I measure your gratitude, if anything of the kind is due to me from you, by your constancy in letter-writing. My feeling of your gratitude to me will be strongest when the fruits of those services of mine to you of which you speak shall appear not so much in frequent letters as in your perseverance and laudable proficiency in excellent pursuits. You have rightly marked out for yourself the path of virtue in that theatre of the world on which you have entered; but remember that the path is common so far to virtue and vice, and that you have yet to advance to where the path divides itself into two. And you ought now betimes to prepare yourself for leaving this common path, pleasant and flowery, and for being able the more readily, with your own will, though with labour and danger, to climb that arduous and difficult one which is the slope of virtue only. For this you have great advantages over others, believe me, in having secured so faithful and skilful a guide. Farewell.
“Westminster: December 20, 1659.”