to such representations by their wild utterances in
private, there had been printed protests to the contrary
by leading Royalists in London and in many of the
counties. They desired no revenges, they said;
they reflected on the past as the mysterious course
of an all-wise Providence; they were anxious for an
amicable reunion of all in the path so wonderfully
opened up by the wisdom and valour of General Monk;
they utterly disowned the indiscreet expressions of
fools and “hot-spirited persons”; and they
would take no steps themselves, but would confide
in Monk, the Council of State, and the Parliament,
The London “declaration” to this effect
was signed by ten earls, four viscounts, five lords,
many baronets, knights, and squires, with several
Anglican clergymen, among whom was Jeremy Taylor.
It was of no small use to Monk, who had equally to
be on his guard against too great haste. They
were crowding round him now, and asking why there
should be any more delay, why the king should not be
brought to England at once. His one reply still
was that the Parliament alone could decide what was
to be done, and that he and others were bound to leave
all to the Parliament. Meanwhile Sir John Greenville
had been back from his mission for some time, and had
duly delivered to Monk the important documents from
Breda. Monk had kept Charles’s private
letter, but had given Greenville back all the rest,
including his own commission to be his Majesty’s
Captain-General. Not a soul was to know of their
existence till the moment when they should be produced
in the Parliament.[1]
[Footnote 1: Phillips, 699-701; Skinner, 283-284
and 290-294; Clarendon, 902.]
CHAPTER II.
First Section.
MILTON’S LIFE AND SECRETARYSHIP THROUGH RICHARD’S
PROTECTORATE: SEPT. 1658-MAY 1659.
MILTON AND MARVELL STILL IN THE LATIN SECRETARYSHIP:
MILTON’S FIRST
FIVE STATE-LETTERS FOR RICHARD (NOS. CXXXIII.-CXXXVII.):
NEW EDITION
OF MILTON’S DEFENSIO PRIMA: REMARKABLE
POSTSRCIPT TO THAT
EDITION: SIX MORE STATE-LETTERS FOR RICHARD (NOS.
CXXXVIII.-CXLIII.):
MILTON’S RELATIONS TO THE CONFLICT OF PARTIES
ROUND RICHARD AND IN
RICHARD’S PARLIAMENT: HIS PROBABLE CAREER
BUT FOR HIS BLINDNESS: HIS
CONTINUED CROMWELLIANISM IN POLITICS, BUT WITH STRONGER
PRIVATE
RESERVES, ESPECIALLY ON THE QUESTION OF AN ESTABLISHED
CHURCH: HIS
REPUTATION THAT OF A MAN OF THE COURT-PARTY AMONG
THE
PROTECTORATISTS: HIS TREATISE OF CIVIL POWER
IN ECCLESIASTICAL
CAUSES: ACCOUNT OF THE TREATISE, WITH EXTRACTS:
THE TREATISE MORE
THAN A PLEA FOR RELIGIOUS TOLERATION: CHURCH-DISESTABLISHMENT
THE
FUNDAMENTAL IDEA: THE TREATISE ADDRESSED TO RICHARD’S
PARLIAMENT, AND
CHIEFLY TO VANE AND THE REPUBLICANS THERE: NO
EFFECT FROM IT:
MILTON’S FOUR LAST STATE-LETTERS FOR RICHARD
(NOS. CXLIV.-CXLVII.):
HIS PRIVATE EPISTLE TO JEAN LABADIE, WITH ACCOUNT
OF THAT PERSON:
MILTON IN THE MONTH BETWEEN RICHARD’S DISSOLUTION
OF HIS PARLIAMENT
AND HIS FORMAL ABDICATION: HIS TWO STATE-LETTERS
FOR THE RESTORED
RUMP (NOS. CXLVIII.-CXLIX.).