them; (2) A prophetical account of several things,
whereof some are already past and some yet to come;
(3) A full and ample account of all the chief principles
of the doctrine of Christ ... Nevertheless, because
they are only a declaration of the fountain, and not
the fountain itself, therefore they are not to be
esteemed the principal ground of all Truth and Knowledge,
nor yet the adequate primary rule of faith and manners.
Nevertheless, as that which giveth a true and faithful
testimony of the first foundation, they are and may
be esteemed a secondary rule, subordinate to the Spirit,
from which they have all their excellency and certainty.”
So much for the form of the central principle
of Early Quakerism, so far as it can be expressed
logically. But it was in the resolute application
of the principle in practice that the Early Quakers
made themselves conspicuous. They were not Speculative
Voluntaries, waiting for the abolition of the National
Church, and paying tithes meanwhile. They were
Separatists who would at once and in every way assert
their Separatism. They would pay no tithes; they
called every church “a steeple-house”;
and they regarded every parson as the hired performer
in one of the steeple-houses. Then, in their own
meetings for mutual edification and worship, all their
customs were in accordance with their main principle.
They had no fixed articles of congregational creed,
no prescribed forms of prayer, no ordinance of baptism
or of sacramental communion, no religious ceremony
in sanction of marriage, and no paid or appointed
preachers. The ministry was to be as the spirit
moved; all equally might speak or be silent, poor
as well as rich, unlearned as well as learned, women
as well as men; if special teachers did spring up
amongst them, it should not be professionally, or
to earn a salary. Yet, with all this liberty
among themselves, what unanimity in the moral purport
of their teachings! Their restless dissatisfaction
with the Established Church and with all known varieties
of Dissent, their passion for a full reception of
Christ at the fountain-head, their searchings of the
Scriptures, their private raptures and meditations,
their prayers and consultations in public, had resulted
in a simple re-issue of the Christianity of the Sermon
on the Mount. Quakerism, in its kernel, was but
the revived Christian morality of meekness, piety,
benevolence, purity, truthfulness, peacefulness, and
passivity. There were to be no oaths: Yea
or Nay was to be enough. There were to be no
ceremonies of honour or courtesy-titles among men:
the hat was to be taken off to no one, and all were
to be addressed in the singular, as Thou and
Thee. War and physical violence were unlawful,
and therefore all fighting and the trade of a soldier.
Injuries to oneself were to be borne with patience,
but there was to be the most active energy in relieving
the sufferings of others, and in seeking out suffering
where it lurked. The sick and those in prison