We gratefully recognize the very acceptable choice which the Adepts have made in selecting Mr. Sinnett as the intermediary between us and them.  They could hardly have chosen any one more congenial to our Western minds:—­whether we consider the clearness of his written style, the urbanity of his verbal expositions, or the earnest sincerity of his convictions.  Since they have thus far met our peculiar needs with such considerate judgment, we cannot but hope that they may find themselves able yet further to adapt their modes of teaching to the requirements of Occidental thought.

—­An English F.T.S. 
London, July 1883.

Reply to an English F.T.S

Answers

It was not in contemplation, at the outset of the work begun in Fragments, to deal as fully with the scientific problems of cosmic evolution as now seems expected.  A distinct promise was made, as Mr. Sinnett is well aware, to acquaint the readers with the outlines of Esoteric doctrines and—­no more.  A good deal would be given, much more kept back.

This seeming unwillingness to share with the world some of Nature’s secrets that may have come into the possession of the few, arises from causes quite different from the one generally assigned.  It is not selfishness erecting a Chinese wall between occult science and those who would know more of it, without making any distinction between the simply curious profane, and the earnest, ardent seeker after truth.  Wrong and unjust are those who think so; who attribute to indifference for other people’s welfare a policy necessitated, on the contrary, by a far-seeing universal philanthropy; who accuse the custodians of lofty physical and spiritual though long rejected truths, of holding them high above the people’s heads.  In truth, the inability to reach them lies entirely with the seekers.  Indeed, the chief reason among many others for such a reticence, at any rate, with regard to secrets pertaining to physical sciences—­is to be sought elsewhere.* It rests entirely on the impossibility of imparting that the nature of which is at the present stage of the world’s development, beyond the comprehension of the would-be learners, however intellectual and however scientifically trained may be the latter.  This tremendous difficulty is now explained to the few, who, besides having read “Esoteric Buddhism,” have studied and understood the several occult axioms approached in it.  It is safe to say that it will not be even vaguely realized by the general reader, but will offer the pretext for sheer abuse.  Nay, it has already.