The manifesto then goes on to meet the charges concerning slavery and ill-treatment of natives brought against the Transvaal by a flat denial.  “They may be true,” they say, “as to actions done long ago, and they humbly pray to the Lord God to forgive them the sins that may have been committed in hidden corners.  Believe us, therefore, Gentlemen, when we say that the opposition to our Government is caused by prejudice, and fed by misunderstanding.  If you leave us untrammelled, we hope to God that before a new generation has passed, a considerable portion of our natives in the Transvaal will be converted to Christianity; at least our Government is preparing arrangements for a more thorough Christian mission among them.”

A public Meeting was held at the Mansion House, called by the Lord Mayor, Sir R. Fowler, at which the Right Hon. W.E.  Forster, referring to the Sand River and the other Conventions said:  “can anything be more grossly unfair and unjust than on the one hand, to hand over these native people to the Transvaal Government, and on the other hand to do our utmost to prevent them from defending themselves when their rights are attacked?  I cannot conceive any provision more contrary to that principle of which we are so proud—­British fair play.”

Speaking of the treatment of the Bechuanaland people by the Boers he said:  “The story of these men is a very sad one; I would rather never allude to it again.”  He then referred to “the settlement of the western boundary of the Transvaal by Governor Keate, and the immediate repudiation of it by the Transvaal Rulers.  Then came the Pretoria Convention only two years ago which added a large block of native land to the Transvaal.  That was not enough.  Freebooters came over, mostly from the Transvaal, and afterwards from other parts of the country.  Representations and remonstrances were made to the Transvaal Government.  There was a non possumus reply.  ‘We cannot stop them;’ We seem to have good ground for believing that the freebooters were stimulated by the officers of the Transvaal Government.  The result was that the native Chiefs of the people lost by far the larger portion of their land.  They appealed to our Government, and we did nothing; there came again and again despairing appeals to England, and how were they met?  I can only believe it was through ignorance of the question that it was possible to meet them as we did.  It was proposed to meet them by a miserable compensation in money or in land, not to the people but to the few Chiefs, who to their credit, as a lesson to us, a great Christian Country said:  ‘We will not desert our people even if you desert us.’  Then there followed utter disorder and disorganisation in Bechuanaland.  Then came in the Transvaal Government and virtually said:  ’Give us the country and we will maintain order; if owners of the land object we will put them down as rebels; we will take their land as we have taken Mapoch’s, and apprentice their children.  You have got tired of these quarrels, leave them to us; we will put a stop to them by protecting the robbers who have taken the land.’