[Footnote 19:  Paget to Lord Mulgrave (March 19th, 1805).]

[Footnote 20:  Beer, “Zehn Jahre oesterreich.  Politik (1801-1810).”  The notes of Novossiltzoff and Hardenberg are printed in Sir G. Jackson’s “Diaries,” vol i., App.]

[Footnote 21:  See Bignon, vol. iv., pp. 271 and 334.  Probably Napoleon knew through Laforest and Talleyrand that Russia had recently urged that George III. should offer Hanover to Prussia.  Pitt rejected the proposal.  Prussia paid more heed to the offer of Hanover from Napoleon than to the suggestions of Czartoryski that she might receive it from its rightful owner, George III.  Yet Duroc did not succeed in gaining more from Frederick William than the promise of his neutrality (see Garden, “Traites,” vol. viii., pp. 339-346).  Sweden was not a member of the Coalition, but made treaties with Russia and England.

The high hopes nursed by the Pitt Ministry are seen in the following estimate of the forces that would be launched against France:  Austria, 250,000; Russia, 180,000; Prussia, 100,000 (Pitt then refused to subsidize more than 100,000); Sweden, 16,000; Saxony, 16,000; Hesse and Brunswick, 16,000; Mecklenburg, 3,000; King of Sardinia, 25,000; Bavaria, Wuertemberg, and Baden, 25,000; Naples, 20,000.  In a P.S. he adds that the support of the King of Sardinia would not be needed, and that England had private arrangements with Naples as to subsidies.  This Memoir is not dated, but it must belong to the beginning of September, before the defection of Bavaria was known ("F.O.,” Prussia, No. 70).]

[Footnote 22:  “F.O.,” Russia, No. 57; Gower’s note of July 22nd, 1805.]

[Footnote 23:  Colonel Graham’s despatches, which undoubtedly influenced the Pitt Ministry in favouring the appointment of Mack to the present command.  Paget ("Papers,” vol. ii., p. 238) states that the Iller position was decided on by Francis.  The best analysis of Mack’s character is in Bernhardi’s “Memoirs of Count Toll” (vol. i., p. 121).  The State Papers are in Burke’s “Campaign of 1805,” App.]

[Footnote 24:  Marmont, “Mems.,” vol. ii., p. 310.]

[Footnote 25:  See “Paget Papers,” vol. ii., p. 224; also Schoenhals “Der Krieg 1805 in Deutschland,” p. 67.]

[Footnote 26:  “Corresp.,” No. 9249.  See too No. 9254 for the details of the enveloping moves which Napoleon then (September 22nd) accurately planned twenty-five days before the final blows were dealt:  yet No. 9299 shows that, even on September 30th, he believed Mack would hurry back to the Inn.  Beer, p. 145.]

[Footnote 27:  Ruestow, “Der Krieg 1805.”  Hormayr, “Geschichte Hofers” (vol. i., p. 96), states that, in framing with Russia the plan of campaign, the Austrians forgot to allow for the difference (twelve days) between the Russian and Gregorian calendars.  The Russians certainly were eleven days late.]

[Footnote 28:  “Corresp.,” No 9319; Sir G. Jackson’s “Diaries,” vol. i., p. 334.]