with which we have to deal. The astronomer can
employ material illustrations to give form and substance
to our conceptions of celestial space; but such a
resource is unavailable to the geologist. The
few thousand years of which we have historical evidence
sink into absolute insignificance beside the unnumbered
aeons which unroll themselves one by one as we penetrate
the dim recesses of the past, and decipher with feeble
vision the ponderous volumes in which the record of
the earth is written. Vainly does the strained
intellect seek to overtake an ever-receding commencement,
and toil to gain some adequate grasp of an apparently
endless succession. A beginning there must have
been, though we can never hope to fix its point.
Even speculation droops her wings in the attenuated
atmosphere of a past so remote, and the light of imagination
is quenched in the darkness of a history so ancient.
In
time, as in
space, the confines of
the universe must ever remain concealed from us, and
of the end we know no more than of the beginning.
Inconceivable as is to us the lapse of “geological
time,” it is no more than “a mere moment
of the past, a mere infinitesimal portion of eternity.”
Well may “the human heart, that weeps and trembles,”
say, with Richter’s pilgrim through celestial
space, “I will go no farther; for the spirit
of man acheth with this infinity. Insufferable
is the glory of God. Let me lie down in the grave,
and hide me from the persecution of the Infinite,
for end, I see, there is none.”
CHAPTER I.
THE SCOPE AND MATERIALS OF PALAEONTOLOGY.
The study of the rock-masses which constitute the
crust of the earth, if carried out in the methodical
and scientific manner of the geologist, at once brings
us, as has been before remarked, in contact with the
remains or traces of living beings which formerly
dwelt upon the globe. Such remains are found,
in greater or less abundance, in the great majority
of rocks; and they are not only of great interest
in themselves, but they have proved of the greatest
importance as throwing light upon various difficult
problems in geology, in natural history, in botany,
and in philosophy. Their study constitutes the
science of palaeontology; and though it is possible
to proceed to a certain length in geology and zoology
without much palaeontological knowledge, it is hardly
possible to attain to a satisfactory general acquaintance
with either of these subjects without having mastered
the leading facts of the first. Similarly, it
is not possible to study palaeontology without some
acquaintance with both geology and natural history.