But not all the statutes, nor public executions, nor the active preaching of the Dominican friars, who undertook to convert them if they were constrained to hear their sermons—­the king’s bailiffs, on the petition of the friars, were ordered to induce the Jews to become quiet, meek, and uncontentious hearers—­could either alter the Jewish character, still patient of all evil so that they could extort wealth, or suppress the still increasing clamor of public detestation, which demanded that the land should cast forth from its indignant bosom this irreclaimable race of rapacious infidels.  Still worse, if we may trust a papal bull, the presence and intercourse of the Jews were dangerous to the religion of England.  In the year 1286 the Pope (Honorius IV) addressed a bull to the Archbishop of Canterbury and his suffragans, rebuking them for the remissness of the clergy in not watching more closely the proceedings of the Jews.  The Archbishop, indeed, had not been altogether so neglectful in the duty of persecution.  The number and the splendor of the synagogues in London had moved the indignation, perhaps the jealousy, of Primate Peckham.  He issued his monition to the Bishop of London to inhibit the building any more of these offensively sumptuous edifices, and to compel the Jews to destroy those built within a prescribed time.

The zeal of the Bishop of London (Robert de Gravesend) outran that of the Archbishop; he ordered them all to be levelled to the ground.  The Archbishop, prevailed on by the urgent supplications of the Jews, graciously informed the Bishop that he might conscientiously allow one synagogue, if that synagogue did not wound the eyes of pious Christians by its magnificence.

But the bull of Honorius IV was something more than a stern condemnation of the usurious and extortionate practices of the Jews; it was a complaint of their progress, not merely in inducing Jewish converts to Christianity to apostatize back to Judaism, but of their not unsuccessful endeavors to tempt Christians to Judaism.  “These Jews lure them to their synagogues on the Sabbath—­are we to suppose that there was something splendid and attractive in the synagogue worship of the day?—­and in their friendly intercourse at common banquets, the souls of Christians, softened by wine and good eating and social enjoyment, are endangered.”  The Talmud of the Jews, which they still persist in studying, is especially denounced as full of abomination, falsehood, and infidelity.

The King at length listened to the public voice, and the irrevocable edict of total expulsion from the realm was issued.  Their whole property was seized at once, and just money enough left to discharge their expenses[86] to foreign lands, perhaps equally inhospitable.  The 10th of October was the fatal day.  The King benignantly allowed them till All Saints’ Day; after which all who delayed were to be hanged without mercy.  The King, in the execution of this barbarous proceeding, put on the appearance both of religion and moderation.  Safe-conducts were to be granted to the sea-shore from all parts of the kingdom.  The wardens of the Cinque Ports were to provide shipping and receive the exiles with civility and kindness.  The King expressed his intention of converting great part of his gains to pious uses, but the Church looked in vain for the fulfilment of his vows.