part taken by Middleton in Dekker’s play of
“The Honest Whore” is difficult to discern
from the context or to verify by inner evidence:
though some likeness to his realistic or photographic
method may be admitted as perceptible in the admirable
picture of Bellafront’s morning reception at
the opening of the second act of the first part.
But here we may assert with fair confidence that the
first and the last scenes of the play bear the indisputable
sign-manual of William Rowley. His vigorous and
vivid genius, his somewhat hard and curt directness
of style and manner, his clear and trenchant power
of straightforward presentation or exposition, may
be traced in every line as plainly as the hand of
Middleton must be recognized in the main part of the
tragic action intervening. To Rowley, therefore,
must be assigned the very high credit of introducing
and of dismissing with adequate and even triumphant
effect the strangely original tragic figure which
owes its fullest and finest development to the genius
of Middleton. To both poets alike must unqualified
and equal praise be given for the subtle simplicity
of skill with which they make us appreciate the fatal
and foreordained affinity between the ill-favored,
rough-mannered, broken-down gentleman and the headstrong,
unscrupulous, unobservant girl whose very abhorrence
of him serves only to fling her down from her high
station of haughty beauty into the very clutch of
his ravenous and pitiless passion. Her cry of
horror and astonishment at first perception of the
price to be paid for a service she had thought to
purchase with mere money is so wonderfully real in
its artless and ingenuous sincerity that Shakespeare
himself could hardly have bettered it:
Why, ’tis impossible thou
canst be so wicked,
And shelter such a cunning cruelty,
To make his death the murderer of
my honor!
That note of incredulous amazement that the man whom
she has just instigated to the commission of murder
“can be so wicked” as to have served her
ends for any end of his own beyond the pay of a professional
assassin is a touch worthy of the greatest dramatist
that ever lived. The perfect simplicity of expression
is as notable as the perfect innocence of her surprise;
the candid astonishment of a nature absolutely incapable
of seeing more than one thing or holding more than
one thought at a time. That she, the first criminal,
should be honestly shocked as well as physically horrified
by revelation of the real motive which impelled her
accomplice into crime, gives a lurid streak of tragic
humor to the life-like interest of the scene; as the
pure infusion of spontaneous poetry throughout redeems
the whole work from the charge of vulgar subservience
to a vulgar taste for the presentation or the contemplation
of criminal horror. Instances of this happy and
natural nobility of instinct abound in the casual expressions
which give grace and animation always, but never any
touch of rhetorical transgression or florid superfluity,
to the brief and trenchant sword-play of the tragic
dialogue: