All must admit the necessity of home-discipline.  “It must needs be that offense come.”  There is a corresponding needs be in the proper treatment of these offenses when they do come.  Law implies penalties; and the proper character and execution of these are as essential to the true object and end of government as is the law itself.  The former would he powerless without the latter.  Through the agency of home-discipline the proper fear and love of the child are developed in due proportion and brought into proper relations to each other, making the fear filial and the love reverential.  There is, therefore, the same call for discipline in the family as there is in the state and the church.  It is the condition of true harmony between, the parent and child.  “The child that is used to constraint, feareth not more than he loveth; but give thy son his way, he will hate thee and scorn thee together.”

It is necessary because God commands it; and He commands it because it is indispensable to the security and well-being of the child, and, we might add, of the state and the church.  “Withhold not correction from the child; for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die.  Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.  He that spareth his rod hateth his son; but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.”  Children are by nature depraved, and if left to themselves, will choose evil rather than good; hence, as foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child, the rod of correction must be used to drive them from it.  He must be restrained, corrected, educated under law.  In the language of Cowper—­

  “Plants raised with tenderness are seldom strong;
  Man’s coltish disposition asks the thong;
  And without discipline, the favorite child,
  Like a neglected forester, runs wild.”

There are two false systems of home-discipline, viz., the despotism of discipline, or discipline from the standpoint of law without love; and the libertinism of discipline, or discipline from the standpoint of love without law.

Home-discipline from the standpoint of law without love, involves the principle of parental despotism.  It is extreme legal severity, and consists in the treatment of children as if they were brutes, using no other mode of correction than that of direct corporeal punishment.  This but hardens them, and begets a roughness of nature and spirit like the discipline under which they are brought up.  Many parents seek to justify such mechanical severity by the saying of Solomon, “he that spareth the rod spoileth the child.”  But their interpretation of this does not show the wisdom of the wise man.  They suppose the term rod, must mean the iron rod of the unfeeling and unloving despot.  Not so; God has a rod for all His children; but it is the rod of a compassionate Father, and does not always inflict corporeal punishment.  It is exercised because He loves them, not because He delights in revenge