When the resignation of M. Grevy had been accepted, came the question, Who should succeed him?  If the Republican party split and failed to choose a president, the Monarchists might seize their opportunity.  The candidate most acceptable to the Moderate Republicans was M. Jules Ferry, but he was unpopular with the Radicals.  He had belonged to the Committee of Defence and the Government of Versailles which had put down the Commune.  His colonial policy had not been a success, and he was known to have no toleration for the Reds.  Mobs collected in the streets shouting “A bas Ferry!” He was accused of being the candidate of the Comte de Paris, of the pope, of Bismarck.  He was “Ferry the traitor!  Ferry the Prussian!  Ferry the clerical!  Ferry the Orleanist!” The Radicals, with the ex-Communist, General Eudes, at their head, swore to take up arms if Ferry were elected by the Chambers.  The Moderate Republicans were not strong enough, without help, to carry his election.  It was a case when a “dark horse” was wanted, an obscure man, against whom nothing was known.

The Radicals proposed two candidates,—­M.  De Freycinet, who, though not a Radical, was thought weak enough to be ruled by them, and M. Floquet.  But the Moderates would not lend their aid to elect either of these men.  At last both parties united on M. Sadi-Carnot.

[Illustration:  PRESIDENT SADI-CARNOT.]

There were two reasons for his election:  the first lay in his name; he was the grandson of Lazare Carnot, elected deputy in 1792 to the National Convention from Arras, at the same time as his friend Robespierre.  This man and Robespierre had belonged to the same Literary Society in Arras,—­a club into which no one could be admitted without writing a love-song.[1] Lazare Carnot was the good man of the Revolution.  Not a stain rests upon his character.  He organized the glorious armies of the Republic, and was afterwards one of the members of the Directory.  His son, Hippolyte Camot, as the oldest member in the Senate in 1887, had the duty of announcing to his own son, Sadi-Carnot, his election to the highest office in the gift of his countrymen.  M. Hippolyte Carnot was a man of high character, who during a long life had filled many public offices.  He was also a man of letters, and wrote a Life of Barere,—­a book that will be best remembered by having come under the lash of Macaulay.  Every cut inflicted upon Barere tells, and we delight in its severity.

The second reason for Sadi-Carnot’s election was the popularity he acquired from its being supposed that when he was at the head of the Committee of Finance he had resisted some illegal demands made on the Treasury by M. Wilson.  The demands were resisted, it is true, but not more by M. Carnot than by his colleagues.  “He was made president of the French Republic,” some one said, “for an act of integrity he had never committed, and for giving himself the trouble to be born, like any heir of royalty.”