Ames was born at Dedham, Massachusetts, on April 9th, 1758.  His father, Nathaniel Ames, a physician, had the “honorable family standing” which was so important in the life of most of the colonies.  He had scientific tendencies and published an “Astronomical Diary,” or nautical almanac, which was in considerable vogue.  The son, however, developed at the early age of six years a fondness for classical literature, which led him to undertake to master Latin.  He made such progress that he was admitted to Harvard when but twelve years old.  While there, it “was observed that he coveted the glory of eloquence,” showing his fondness for oratory not merely in the usual debating society declamation, but by the study of classical models and of such great English poets as Shakespeare and Milton.  To this, no doubt correctly, has been attributed his great command of language and his fertility in illustration.  After graduating from Harvard in 1774, he studied law in Boston, served in the Massachusetts legislature, in the convention for ratifying the Federal constitution, and in the first Congress elected under the constitution.  After retiring, be was called in 1804 to the presidency of Harvard.  He declined the honor, however, on account of diffidence and failing health.  His death occurred on the fourth of July, 1808, in the fiftieth year of his age.

After the treaty with Great Britain (Jay’s), concluded in 1794, had been ratified and proclaimed by the President, he communicated it to the House of Representatives, “in order that the necessary appropriations might be made to carry it into effect.”  The speech on the Treaty, delivered by Ames, was on a resolution in favor of making the appropriations thus called for, the House being in committee of the whole April 28th, 1796.

ON THE BRITISH TREATY

(Delivered in the House of Representatives, April 28, 1796)

Mr. Chairman:—­

I entertain the hope, perhaps a rash one, that my strength will hold me out to speak a few minutes.

In my judgment, a right decision will depend more on the temper and manner with which we may prevail upon ourselves to contemplate the subject than upon the development of any profound political principles, or any remarkable skill in the application of them.  If we could succeed to neutralize our inclinations, we should find less difficulty than we have to apprehend in surmounting all our objections.

The suggestion, a few days ago, that the House manifested symptoms of heat and irritation, was made and retorted as if the charge ought to create surprise, and would convey reproach.  Let us be more just to ourselves and to the occasion.  Let us not affect to deny the existence and the intrusion of some portion of prejudice and feeling into the debate, when, from the very structure of our nature, we ought to anticipate the circumstance as a probability, and when we are admonished by the evidence of our senses that it is the fact.