In explaining those appearances of degraded mountains variously shaped, the fact we are now to reason upon is this; first, that in the consolidated earth we find great inequality in the resisting powers of the various consolidated bodies, both from the different degrees of consolidation which had taken place among them, and the different degrees of solubility which is found in the consolidated substances; and, secondly, that we find great diversity in the size, form, and positions of those most durable bodies which, by resisting longer the effects of the wearing operations of the surface, must determine the shape of the remaining mass.  Now so far as every particular shape upon the surface of this earth is found to correspond to the effect of those two causes, the theory which gave those principles must be confirmed in the examination of the earth; and so far as the theory is admitted to be just, we have principles for the explanation of every appearance of that kind, whether from the forming or destroying operations of this earth, there being no part upon the surface of this earth in which the effect of both those causes must not more or less appear.

But though the effects of those two causes be evident in the conformation of every mountainous region, it is not always easy to analyse those effects so as to see the efficient cause.  Without sections of mountains their internal structure cannot be perceived, if the surface which we see be covered with soil as is generally the case.  It is true, indeed, that the solid bodies often partially appear through that covering of soil, and so far discover to us what is to be found within; but as those solid parts are often in disorder, we cannot, from a small portion, always judge of the generality.  Besides, the solid parts of mountains is often a compound thing, composed both of stratified and injected bodies; it is therefore most precarious, from a portion which is seen, to form a judgment of a whole mass which is unexplored.  Nevertheless, knowing the principles observed by nature both in the construction and degradation of mountains, and cautiously inferring nothing farther than the data will admit of, some conclusion may be formed, in reasoning from what is known to what is still unknown.

It is with this view that we are now to consider the general forms of mountains, such as they appear to us at a certain distance, when we have not the opportunity of examining them in a more perfect manner.  For, though we may not thus learn always to understand that which is thus examined, we shall learn, what is still more interesting, viz. that those mountains have been formed in the natural operations of the earth, and according to physical rules that may be investigated.

We are to distinguish mountains as being either on the one hand soft and smooth, or on the other hand as hard and rocky.  If we can understand those two great divisions by themselves, we shall find it easy to explain the more complex cases, where these two general appearances partially prevail.  Let us therefore examine this general division which we have made with regard to the external character of mountains.