At the third session of the Forty-fifth Congress, Mr. Robinson, from his minor place on the Committee on Expenditures in the Department of Justice, introduced a bill relative to the mileage of United States Marshals, which proposed an important reform.

In the Forty-sixth Congress, at the first session, Mr. Robinson, on account of the marked abilities which he had shown as a lawyer and a debater, was appointed a member of the Judiciary Committee, a position which he held through the Forty-sixth Congress with honor to his district and his State.  From the outset of the Forty-sixth Congress Mr. Robinson, to the great surprise of many older members, who were not able to fathom the mystery of the rules, took front rank as a debater on points of order, and showed that his months of silent observation and of earnest study had brought their fruit.  His discussion of points of order and of the rules was always characterized by good sense.  He did not seek to befog a question by an extensive quotation of authorities.  He endeavored to strip the rules of their technicalities and to apply to them the principle of common sense.  Sometimes, however, he was almost in despair, and once in the course of an intricate discussion he exclaimed (March 28, 1879):  “If there is a standing and clear rule that guides the Chair, I have not yet found it.”

At the second session of the Forty-sixth Congress, Western and Southern Democrats united their forces in support of an amendment to the “Culbertson Court bill,” which was designed to limit the jurisdiction of the United States courts.  Some of the strongest advocates of this amendment were men who, although living in Northern States, were unfriendly to the Union, and who, since the war, have been continuously aggressive in their efforts to place limitations upon national power.  Mr. Robinson was a member of the Judiciary Committee and spoke upon the bill.  His speech upon this measure attracted more attention than any speech he had delivered before that time.  It commanded the undivided attention of the House, which was so interested in it that, although the debate was running in the valuable time of the morning hour, Mr. Robinson, on motion of a Democrat, Mr. Randolph Tucker, after the expiration of his time, was requested to continue.  The speech was a powerful, logical, patriotic defence of the federal courts.  A few extracts from the general parts of this speech furnish an excellent illustration of the abilities of Mr. Robinson as a debater and orator, as well as of his strong convictions.  He spoke as the son of a Jackson Democrat would be likely to speak.  He vigorously opposed the increase in the limit from $500 to $2,000 as proposed by the Southern and Western Democrats.