Elements of Debating eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 138 pages of information about Elements of Debating.

Elements of Debating eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 138 pages of information about Elements of Debating.
force remains; but, force failing, no further hope of reconciliation is left.  Power and authority are sometimes bought by kindness; but they can never be begged as alms by an impoverished and defeated violence.
A further objection to force is that you impair the object by your very endeavor to preserve it.  The thing you fought for is not the thing which you recover; but depreciated, sunk, wasted, and consumed in the contest.  Nothing less will content me than whole America.  I do not choose to consume its strength along with our own, because in all parts it is the British strength that I consume.  I do not choose to be caught by a foreign enemy at the end of this exhausting conflict; and still less in the midst of it.  I may escape; but I can make no insurance against such an event.  Let me add that I do not choose wholly to break the American spirit:  because it is the spirit that has made the country.
Lastly, we have no sort of experience in favor of force as an instrument in the rule of our Colonies.  Their growth and their utility has been owing to methods altogether different.  Our ancient indulgence has been said to be pursued to a fault.  It may be so.  But we know, if feeling is evidence, that our fault was more tolerable than our attempt to mend it; and our sin far more salutary than our penitence.

2.  Wells’s Geometry gives the following proposition:  “Two perpendiculars to the same straight line are parallel.”  The evidence given is:  “If they are not parallel, they will, if sufficiently produced, meet at some point, which is impossible, because from a given point without a straight line but one perpendicular can be drawn.”  Is this evidence sufficient to constitute proof?  Does it convince you?  Why, or why not?

3.  Set down as much evidence as you can think of in ten minutes, to convince a business man that a high-school education is an advantage in business life.

4.  Support the statement that football has benefited or harmed this school, with five truthful statements that are evidence.  Indicate which ones would be most effective, if you were speaking to the students, and which would make the strongest impression on the faculty.

5.  In the following statements of testimony, tell which ones would be good evidence and which not.  Tell why or why not in each case.

    (1) X, a student, was told that unless he should point out the pupil
    who had put matches on the floor, he would be expelled.  X then said
    that Y was guilty.

    (2) James Brown, a teamster, asserts that the use of alcohol is
    beneficial to all persons.

    (3) John Burns, a labor leader, declares that labor unions are
    beneficial to trade.

    (4) F. W. McCorkle, a large manufacturer, states that labor unions
    have proved beneficial to commerce.

    (5) Professor Sheldon, a college president and profound student of
    economics, has declared that labor unions help the trade of the
    world.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Elements of Debating from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.