kept my mind in a continual alternation of attention
and delight.... My imagination did not leave the
earth thus superbly arrayed without inhabitants.
I formed a charming society, of which I did not feel
myself unworthy; I made a golden age to please my
own fancy, and filling up these fair days with all
those scenes of my life that had left sweet memories
behind, and all that my heart could yet desire or
hope in scenes to come, I waxed tender even to shedding
tears over the true pleasures of humanity, pleasures
so delicious, so pure, and henceforth so far from
the reach of men. Ah, if in such moments any
ideas of Paris, of the age, of my little aureole as
author, came to trouble my dreams, with what disdain
did I drive them out, to deliver myself without distraction
to the exquisite sentiments of which I was so full.
Yet in the midst of it all, the nothingness of my
chimeras sometimes broke sadly upon my mind. Even
if every dream had suddenly been transformed into
reality, it would not have been enough; I should have
dreamed, imagined, yearned still.” Alas,
this deep insatiableness of sense, the dreary vacuity
of soul that follows fulness of animal delight, the
restless exactingness of undirected imagination, was
never recognised by Rousseau distinctly enough to modify
either his conduct or his theory of life. He
filled up the void for a short space by that sovereign
aspiration, which changed the dead bones of old theology
into the living figure of a new faith. “From
the surface of the earth I raised my ideas to all
the existences in nature, to the universal system
of things, to the incomprehensible Being who embraces
all. Then with mind lost in that immensity, I
did not think, I did not reason, I did not philosophise;
with a sort of pleasure I felt overwhelmed by the
weight of the universe, I surrendered myself to the
ravishing confusion of these vast ideas. I loved
to lose myself in imagination in immeasurable space;
within the limits of real existences my heart was
too tightly compressed; in the universe I was stifled;
I would fain have launched myself into the infinite.
I believe that if I had unveiled all the mysteries
of nature, I should have found myself in a less delicious
situation than that bewildering ecstasy to which my
mind so unreservedly delivered itself, and which sometimes
transported me until I cried out, ‘O mighty
Being! O mighty Being!’ without power of
any other word or thought."[257]
It is not wholly insignificant that though he could thus expand his soul with ejaculatory delight in something supreme, he could not endure the sight of one of his fellow-creatures. “If my gaiety lasted the whole night, that showed that I had passed the day alone; I was very different after I had seen people, for I was rarely content with others and never with myself. Then in the evening I was sure to be in taciturn or scolding humour.” It is not in every condition that effervescent passion for ideal forms of the religious imagination assists sympathy