In the provinces of Gueldres and Overyssell, he met with no resistance; and little at Arnheim:  greater resistance was expected at Utretcht:  the States of Holland sent Grotius and Hoogerbetz, the Pensionary of Leyden, to stimulate the inhabitants to resistance; but the fortune of the Prince prevailed.  In an extraordinary assembly, which consisted of eight persons only, yet assuming to act as the States General, the Prince procured an ordonnance to be passed, which directed Barneveldt, Grotius, and Hoogerbetz to be taken into immediate custody.  They were accordingly arrested, and confined in the Castle at the Hague.

[Sidenote:  CHAP.  V. 1610-1617.]

Thus the Prince’s party prevailed in every part of the United Provinces.  About this time, he succeeded, in consequence of the death of his elder brother, to the dignity of Prince of Orange.

CHAPTER VI.

THE SYNOD OF DORT.

1618.

[Sidenote:  CHAP.  VI. 1618.]

The States General determined that the Synod[024] should be composed of twenty-six divines of the United Provinces, twenty-eight foreign divines, five professors of divinity, and sixteen laymen;—­seventy-five members in the whole.  The expence was calculated at 100,000 florins.  The English divines were, Dr. George Carlton, Bishop of Llandaff; Dr. Joseph Hall, Dean of Worcester; John Davenant, professor of divinity, and Master of Queen’s college, Cambridge; Samuel Ward, Archdeacon of Taunton, and head of Sidney college, Cambridge.  To these were added, Walter Balcanqual, a Scottish theologian, as representative of the Scottish churches.  The ever-memorable John Hales of Eaton, as that learned and amiable person is justly termed by protestant writers, was permitted to attend the debates of the Synod, but was not allowed to speak, or take any part in its proceedings.

[Sidenote:  The Synod of Dort.]

We have mentioned that Arminius was converted to the opinions, which he defended afterwards so strenuously, by the perusal of a work in support of the opposite doctrine, which he had been desired to confute.  In the same manner, the proceedings of the Contra-Remonstrants, at the Synod of Dort, made Mr. Hales a Remonstrant.  We are informed by his friend Mr. Faringdon, that, in his younger days, he was a Calvinist; but that some explanations given by Episcopius of the text in John iii. 16, induced him, as he himself said, to “bid John Calvin, Good Night.”  His letters from Dort to Sir Dudley Carleton, the English ambassador at the Hague, contain an interesting account of the proceedings of the assembly.[025] [Sidenote:  CHAP.  VI. 1618.]

Dr. Heylin says, in his “Quinquarticular History,” that the theologians sent by King James to Dort, were inclined to condemn the Remonstrants; but he intimates that the monarch acted from reasons of state; and that he was more hostile to their persons than their doctrines:  Brand makes the same remark upon Prince Maurice.  It seems to be admitted, that, in the conference at Hampton Court, King James declared against absolute predestination.[026]