In the afternoon a different company from these natural objects in the distance came to occupy our minds for the time being.  Gradually the up stairs sitting-room, which we had foolishly perhaps imagined reserved for our party of nine, became invaded by priests in long coats down to their heels and muddy top-boots.  We, the new-comers from the mountains, now learnt that this was the daily occurrence, and really the most unpleasant feature of the house, where the landlord and landlady remained as sleepy and unimpressionable as ever.  We were soon, in fact, obliged to vacate the room, driven out not only by the fumes of bad tobacco, but by the unsatisfactory stare which was leveled at each intruder.  The kellnerin, generally a slow, incommunicative mortal, now passed, from cellar to sitting-room in a flutter of excitement, her tongue, otherwise dormant, moving like a mill-clapper in the enlivening society of her spiritual fathers.  These were the shepherds of the different adjoining parishes, whose custom it was to derive mental and corporeal comfort in sipping their acid wine and smoking their cheap tobacco in company.  There might not have been any great harm in it, but nevertheless it seemed an apparent falling away from the singularly bright example which a good man, born only ten minutes from the Elephant, in the village of Muehlen, had once set them.

The priest Michael Feichter, at his death in 1832 the head of the clerical seminary at Brixen, became for a time, through his extreme goodness and grace, the unseen regenerator of the Church in the Tyrol.  A simple, guileless man, with intense love and cheerfulness, he acted as if God his friend were ever by his side.  The entire Bible, which he had chiefly studied on his knees, he knew literally by heart.  Birds, flowers and stones gave him subjects for stirring sermons, and his evening conversations with his pupils were fraught with the most beneficent consequences through his intense sympathy and the power he unwittingly possessed of diving deep into the conscience.  Sorrows were met invariably by him with a cheerful “Dominus providebit” or “parcat Deus.”  Cheating and deceit pained him greatly, and he therefore rejoiced to become acquainted with honest Jews, conscientious officials and religious soldiers.  Thoughts of wealth and station never troubled him.  He walked like a child through the world.  When unable to wear his scholastic gown he moved about, his serene face beaming with cheerful urbanity from under the shadow of a broad-brimmed cocked hat, his pride and delight, as it spared him both sunshade and umbrella.  His old coat of an antique cut still bore on the under side of a flap the dyer’s mark.  His waistcoat and stockings were of black knitted wool.  On festive occasions, however, he fastened to the back of his coat collar a fluttering band denoting his doctorate.  There was something humorous in his appearance:  he knew it and laughed at it, and yet, says one of his pupils, “though we joined in the laugh, his whole person and demeanor touched us deeply:  we knew that he was not of this world.”