In my present position, I could scarcely be justified were I to omit raising a warning voice against this approach of returning despotism.  It is not needed nor fitting here, that a general argument should be made in favor of popular institutions; but there is one point, with its connections, not so hackneyed as most others, to which I ask a brief attention.  It is the effort to place capital on an equal footing with, if not above, labor, in the structure of government.  It is assumed that labor is available only in connection with capital; that nobody labors unless somebody else, owning capital, somehow, by the use of it, induces him to labor.  This assumed, it is next considered whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent, or buy them, and drive them to it without their consent.  Having proceeded so far, it is naturally concluded that all laborers are either hired laborers or what we call slaves.  And further, it is assumed that whoever is once a hired laborer is fixed in that condition for life.  Now, there is no such relation between capital and labor as assumed; nor is there any such thing as a free man being fixed for life in the condition of a hired laborer.  Both these assumptions are false, and all inferences from them are groundless.  Labor is prior to and independent of capital.  Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed.  Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.  Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights.  Nor is it denied that there is, and probably always will be, a relation between labor and capital, producing mutual benefits.  The error is in assuming that the whole labor of community exists within that relation.  A few men own capital, and those few avoid labor themselves, and, with their capital, hire or buy another few to labor for them.  A large majority belong to neither class—­neither work for others, nor have others working for them.  In most of the Southern States, a majority of the whole people of all colors are neither slaves nor masters; while in the North, a large majority are neither hirers nor hired.  Men, with their families—­wives, sons, and daughters—­work for themselves, on their farms, in their houses, and in their shops, taking the whole product to themselves, and asking no favors of capital on the one hand, nor of hired laborers or slaves on the other.  It is not forgotten that a considerable number of persons mingle their own labor with capital—­that is, they labor with their own hands, and also buy or hire others to labor for them; but this is only a mixed, not a distinct class.  No principle stated is disturbed by the existence of this mixed class.  Again, as has already been said, there is not, of necessity, any such thing as the free hired laborer being fixed to that condition for life.  Many independent men everywhere in