for that day’s debate, but the thing which would stand the test of time and square itself with eternal justice.  He wished nothing to appear white unless it was white.  His logic was severe and faultless.  He did not resort to fallacy, and could detect it in his opponent and expose it with merciless directness.  He had an abounding sense of humor, and always employed it in illustration of his argument—­but never for the mere sake of provoking merriment.  In this respect he had the wonderful aptness of Franklin.  He often taught a great truth with the felicitous brevity of an Aesop fable.  His words did not flow in an impetuous torrent, as did those of Douglas; but they were always well chosen, deliberate and conclusive.”

Mr. Arnold, in the course of an extended comparison, says:  “At the time of these discussions, both Lincoln and Douglas were in the full maturity of their powers.  Douglas was forty-five and Lincoln forty-nine years of age.  Physically and mentally, they were as unlike as possible.  Douglas was short, not much more than five feet high, with a large head, massive brain, broad shoulders, a wide, deep chest, and features strongly marked.  He impressed every one, at first sight, as a strong, sturdy, resolute, fearless man.  Lincoln’s herculean stature has already been described.  A stranger who listened to him for five minutes would say:  ’This is a kind, genial, sincere, genuine man; a man you can trust, plain, straightforward, honest, and true.’  If this stranger were to hear him make a speech, he would be impressed with his clear good sense, by his wit and humor, by his general intelligence, and by the simple, homely, but pure and accurate language he used.  In his long residence at Washington, Douglas had acquired the bearing and manners of a gentleman and a man of the world.  But he was always a fascinating and attractive man, and always and everywhere personally popular.  He had been for years carefully and thoroughly trained on the stump, in Congress, and in the Senate, to meet in debate the ablest speakers in the State and Nation.  For years he had been accustomed to meet on the floor of the Capitol the leaders of the old Whig and Free-soil parties.  Among them were Webster and Seward, Fessenden and Crittenden, Chase, Trumbull, Hale and others of nearly equal eminence; and his enthusiastic friends insisted that never, either in single conflict or when receiving the assault of the senatorial leaders of a whole party, had he been discomfited.  His style was bold, vigorous, and aggressive; at times even defiant.  He was ready, fluent, fertile in resources, familiar with national and party history, severe in denunciation, and he handled with skill nearly all the weapons of debate.  His iron will and restless energy, together with great personal magnetism, made him the idol of his friends and party.  His long, brilliant, and almost universally successful career, gave him perfect confidence in himself, and at times he was arrogant