Ireland and the Home Rule Movement eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 281 pages of information about Ireland and the Home Rule Movement.

Ireland and the Home Rule Movement eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 281 pages of information about Ireland and the Home Rule Movement.
1898, and in the succeeding years the number steadily diminished, so that they amounted in 1899 to 6,000, in 1900 to 5,000, and in 1901 to only 3,000.  The reasons for this are not difficult to find.  The payment in Consols was profitable so long as securities stood at a high figure, but the expenses arising from the South African war resulted in a fall of Stocks from 112 to 85, and as a result new terms for land purchase became imperatively needed.  In consequence Mr. Wyndham brought in a Bill in 1902, which was, however, stillborn, but its withdrawal was accompanied with a promise of legislation in the following session.  The situation in the winter of 1902 was critical.  An Irish Land Trust had been formed by the landlords to oppose the United Irish League, and on the 1st of September there was issued a Viceregal proclamation, putting the Coercion Act in force in Dublin and Limerick.  By a curious coincidence, the papers published the same day a letter from Captain Shaw Taylor, an Irish landlord, inviting representatives of tenants and landlords to meet in conference in Dublin and discuss a way out of the agrarian impasse.  The proposal was scouted by the Times, the Daily Express, and the Dublin Daily Express, but was favourably received by the Press in other quarters.  A motion by Lord Mayo at the Landowners’ Convention, in favour of the conference, was rejected by 77 votes to 14.  A poll on the question being demanded, 4,000 landlords, each with an estate of more than 500 acres, received voting papers, and of these 1,706 replied, 1,128 in favour and 578 against a conference, while the small landlords were almost unanimously in its favour.  A second appeal was then made to the Landowners’ Convention through its president, Lord Abercorn, but an answer in the negative was received, for it went on to say—­“It would be merely to give long-discredited politicians a certificate of good sense and of just views, we might almost say of legislative capacity to sit in an Irish Parliament in Dublin, were we to accept Captain Shaw Taylor’s invitation to join them.”

The criticism of an unbiassed foreign observer on this attitude of rigid cast-iron non possumus is instructive.  “Rappelons nous,” writes M. Bechaux, “que le parti irlandais au Parlement, si grossierement insulte represente 4/5 du peuple irlandais, nous avons un specimen de l’esprit reactionnaire et irreconciliable du landlordisme irlandais.”  In spite of this the Conference met at the end of the year.  The landlords’ representatives were:—­Lord Dunraven, Lord Mayo, Col.  Hutcheson Poee, and Col.  Nugent Everard; and those of the tenants were:—­Mr. John Redmond, Mr. W. O’Brien, Mr. T.W.  Russell, and Mr. T.C.  Harrington.  On the 3rd January, 1903, a joint report to serve as the basis of the new Bill was issued.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Ireland and the Home Rule Movement from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.