on the Order Paper certain omnibus resolutions on the state of Ireland.  Since the days of Parnellite obstruction such scenes were not witnessed as those that followed.  The Party defied all rules of law and order, worried the Government by all sort of lawless interruptions and irrelevant questions, flagrantly flouted the authority of the chair and, finally, after a week of Parliamentary anarchy, it was determined that even more extreme courses would be adopted unless the constitutional right of Ireland to be heard in the Chamber was conceded.  Hint of this was conveyed to Mr Speaker Gully, who, regardful of the honour of the House, used his good offices with the Government to such effect that the blocking motions were incontinently withdrawn and the discussion in due course took place.

Whilst these developments were taking place Mr O’Brien had taken every possible precaution to guard himself against any charge of autocracy in the direction of the movement, whether in Parliament or in the country.  At the request of his colleagues on the Land Conference he had drafted a Memorandum containing the basis of settlement which would be acceptable to Nationalist opinion.  This was submitted to Messrs Redmond, Davitt and Sexton, with an urgent entreaty for their freest criticism or any supplementary suggestions of their own.  None of these could, therefore, complain that Mr O’Brien was attempting to do anything over their heads.  And impartial judgment will declare that if either Mr Sexton, Mr Dillon or Mr Davitt had views of their own, or had any vital disagreements with Mr O’Brien’s suggestions, now was the time to declare them.  Far from committing himself to any dissent, when Mr O’Brien, after a fortnight, wrote to Mr Sexton for the return of his Memorandum, Mr Sexton wrote: 

“I have read the Memo. carefully two or three times and now return it to you as you want to use it and have no other copy.  It will take some time to look into your proposals with anything like sufficient care.  You will hear from me as soon as I think I can say anything that may possibly be of use.”

Be it here noted that Mr Sexton never did communicate, even when he had looked into Mr O’Brien’s proposals “with sufficient care.”  Later he waged implacable war on the Land Conference Report and the Land Act from his commanding position as Managing Director of The Freeman’s Journal (the official National organ).  He did so in violation of the promise on which the Party had entrusted him with that position, that he would never interfere in its political direction.

Other informal meetings between Sir Antony MacDonnell and the Irish leaders followed, the purpose of Sir Antony being, before he accepted office in the Irish Government, to gather the views of leading Irishmen, especially as to the possibility of a genuine land settlement, which he regarded as the foundation of all else.  Subsequently it transpired that Mr Sexton had engaged in some negotiations on his own