Mr Dillon, Mr Redmond promised that his influence
would be extended to an effort to return the landlord
and ascendancy class to the new Councils. The
United Irish League determined to take issue with
him on this. When the elections under the new
Act were announced, Mr Redmond, honestly enough, proceeded
to give effect to his promise. Mr O’Brien
decided, and very rightly and properly in my judgment,
that it would be a fatal policy, and a weak one, to
surrender to the enemy, whilst he was still unconquered
and unrepentant, any of those new Councils which could
be made citadels of national strength and a new fighting
arm of the constitutional movement. It meant
that having driven the landlords forth from the fortresses
from which they had so long oppressed the people, they
should be immediately readmitted to them, having made
no submissions and given no guarantees as to their
future good behaviour. Mr Redmond and his followers
made brave appeal from the landlord platforms to their
supporters “not to be bitten by the Unity dog.”
Mr Healy’s newspaper and influence took a similar
bent. Mr Dillon’s majority, as usual helpless
and indecisive, promulgated no particular policy.
For Mr O’Brien and the United Irish League there
could be no such balancings or doubts. It is
good also to be able to say of Mr Davitt that he assisted
in fighting the insidious attempt to denationalize
the County and District Councils. The League and
its supporters won all along the line. The few
reverses they sustained were negligible when compared
with the mighty victories they obtained all over Ireland,
and when the elections were over the League was established
in an impregnable position as the organisation of disinterested
and genuine nationality.
The Parliamentarians, seeing how matters stood, and
no doubt with a wise thought of their own future,
now proceeded to compose their quarrels. They
saw themselves forgotten of the people, but they were
resolved apparently that the people should not forget
them. They took their cue from a country no longer
divided over sombre futilities, and unable to make
up their minds for themselves they accepted the judgment
of the country once they were aware that it was irrevocably
come to. Mr Dillon after his re-election to the
chair of his section in 1900 immediately announced
his resignation of the office, and being, as we are
assured on the authority of Mr O’Brien, always
sincerely solicitous for peace with the Parnellites,
he caused a resolution to be passed binding the majority
party in case of reunion to elect as their chairman
a member of the Parnellite Party, which numbered merely
nine.