“These words inspired the Romans with so great a zeal, that they willingly lent their aid to the Legate.  Aquapendente, Bolzena yielded, John di Vico was half reduced and half terrified into submission, and Gabrielli, the tyrant of Agobbio, has since succumbed.  The glory is to the Cardinal, but the merit with Rienzi.”

“And now?”

“Albornoz continued to entertain the Senator-Tribune with great splendour and fair words, but not a word about restoring him to Rome.  Wearied with this suspense, I have learned by secret intelligence that Rienzi has left the camp, and betaken himself with few attendants to Florence, where he has friends, who will provide him with arms and money to enter Rome.”

“Ah then! now I guess,” said Adrian, with a half smile, “for whom I was mistaken!”

Montreal blushed slightly.  “Fairly conjectured!” said he.

“Meanwhile, at Rome,” continued the Provencal—­“at Rome, your worthy House, and that of the Orsini, being elected to the supreme power, quarrelled among themselves, and could not keep the authority they had won.  Francesco Baroncelli, (This Baroncelli, who has been introduced to the reader in a former portion of this work, is called by Matteo Villani “a man of vile birth and little learning—­he had been a Notary of the Capitol.”  In the midst of the armed dissensions between the Barons, which followed the expulsion of Rienzi, Baroncelli contrived to make himself Master of the Capitol, and of what was considered an auxiliary of no common importance—­viz. the Great Bell, by whose alarum Rienzi had so often summoned to arms the Roman people.  Baroncelli was crowned Tribune, clothed in a robe of gold brocade, and invested with the crozier-sceptre of Rienzi.  At first, his cruelty against the great took the appearance of protection to the humble; but the excesses of his sons (not exaggerated in the text), and his own brutal but bold ferocity, soon made him execrated by the people, to whom he owed his elevation.  He had the folly to declare against the Pope; and this it really was that mainly induced Innocent to restore, and oppose to their New Demagogue, the former and more illustrious Tribune.  Baroncelli, like Rienzi, was excommunicated; and in his instance, also, the curse of the Church was the immediate cause of his downfall.  In attempting flight he was massacred by the mob, December, 1353.  Some, however, have maintained that he was slain in combat with Rienzi; and others, by a confusion of dates, have made him succeed to Rienzi on the death of the latter.—­Matteo Villani, lib. iii. cap. 78.  Osservaz.  Stor. di Zefirino Re.  Ms. Vat.  Rip. dal Bzovio, ann. 1353.  N. 2.) a new demagogue, a humble imitator of Rienzi, rose upon the ruins of the peace broken by the nobles, obtained the title of Tribune, and carried about the very insignia used by his predecessor.  But less wise than Rienzi, he took the antipapal party.  And the Legate was thus enabled to play the papal demagogue against the usurper.  Baroncelli was a weak man, his sons committed every excess in mimicry of the highborn tyrants of Padua and Milan.  Virgins violated and matrons dishonoured, somewhat contrasted the solemn and majestic decorum of Rienzi’s rule;—­in fine, Baroncelli fell massacred by the people.  And now, if you ask what rules Rome, I answer, ‘It is the hope of Rienzi.’”