Thus constituted, with an immense body of natural means which are lessened in their amount only to be increased in their effect, France has, since the accomplishment of the Revolution, a complete unity in its direction.  It has destroyed every resource of the state which depends upon opinion and the good-will of individuals.  The riches of convention disappear.  The advantages of nature in some measure remain:  even these, I admit, are astonishingly lessened; the command over what remains is complete and absolute.  We go about asking when assignats will expire, and we laugh at the last price of them.  But what signifies the fate of those tickets of despotism?  The despotism will find despotic means of supply.  They have found the short cut to the productions of nature, while others, in pursuit of them, are obliged to wind through the labyrinth of a very intricate state of society.  They seize upon the fruit of the labour; they seize upon the labourer himself.  Were France but half of what it is in population, in compactness, in applicability of its force, situated as it is, and being what it is, it would be too strong for most of the states of Europe, constituted as they are, and proceeding as they proceed.  Would it be wise to estimate what the world of Europe, as well as the world of Asia, had to dread from Genghiz Khan, upon a contemplation of the resources of the cold and barren spot in the remotest Tartary, from whence first issued that scourge of the human race?  Ought we to judge from the excise and stamp duties of the rocks, or from the paper circulation of the sands of Arabia, the power by which Mahomet and his tribes laid hold at once on the two most powerful empires of the world; beat one of them totally to the ground, broke to pieces the other, and, in not much longer space of time than I have lived, overturned governments, laws, manners, religion, and extended an empire from the Indus to the Pyrenees?

Material resources never have supplied, nor ever can supply, the want of unity in design, and constancy in pursuit.  But unity in design, and perseverance and boldness in pursuit, have never wanted resources, and never will.  We have not considered as we ought the dreadful energy of a state in which the property has nothing to do with the government.  Reflect, my dear Sir, reflect again and again, on a government, in which the property is in complete subjection, and where nothing rules but the mind of desperate men.  The condition of a commonwealth not governed by its property was a combination of things which the learned and ingenious speculator Harrington, who has tossed about society into all forms, never could imagine to be possible.  We have seen it; the world has felt it; and if the world will shut their eyes to this state of things, they will feel it more.  The rulers there have found their resources in crimes.  The discovery is dreadful; the mine exhaustless.  They have everything to gain, and they have nothing to lose.  They have a boundless inheritance in